VanEck Research Director: BTC is expected to reach $180,000 next year, but corporate adoption is still insufficient
Matthew Sigel, Head of Digital Asset Research at VanEck, stated in the Coin Stories podcast that by 2025, the price of Bitcoin could reach as high as $180,000. He pointed out that key indicators such as funding rates, unrealized profits and retail speculation are the basis for this prediction. Sigel said that VanEck has been "bullish on Bitcoin" since 2017. However, he believes there is still a long way to go for corporate adoption of Bitcoin.
He said many traditional asset management companies (such as Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch) owned by banks and brokers have been slow to incorporate BTC into their financial strategies. Their strictly regulated structure and reliance on traditional asset allocation models (like the 60-40 portfolio) have not yet adjusted to accommodate BTC ETFs.
Sigel also noted that about 80% of BTC ETF holders are retail or high-net-worth investors who either diversify from self-custody or expand existing positions. He added that institutional asset management firms have not yet entered this field in a big way.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
OGE Energy schedules quarterly earnings conference call and business update
Saia to release quarterly financial results before market open, host conference call
JPMorgan Reveals the Critical Price Level for Bitcoin Miners

Altman: Safety comes first, no IPO timetable, postponing the release of GPT-6.1 Astra out of extreme caution
OpenAI CEO Altman stated that the IPO may only be considered after the company gains a clearer understanding of how to safely manage the "next-level AI." The delay in launching GPT-6.1 Astra is because the model did not meet some of the company’s evaluation criteria for safety; this decision was made "out of an abundance of caution" rather than due to any major incident. He also noted that Nvidia’s safety systems for AI are not a "complete solution;" AI is more of a scientific problem than an engineering one.