Bitcoin Bull Cycle Over? CryptoQuant CEO Warns of Possible Bearish Trend
- End of Bitcoin's bull cycle?
- Bearish trend for BTC.
- Market indicators point to a decline.
CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju stated today, March 18, that the bull cycle of Bitcoin (BTC) is over. The forecast points to a possible downtrend or sideways trend in the next 6 to 12 months, marking a significant change in the landscape for Bitcoin investors and enthusiasts.
“Bitcoin’s bull cycle is over, with 6-12 months of bearish or sideways price action expected,” wrote in a shared analysis on the X platform.
Source: CryptoQuant/Ki Young Ju
The forecast comes after a period of strong growth for Bitcoin, which reached new all-time highs in January 2025 and attracted significant institutional interest. However, indicators such as the decline in inflows into Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) as well as metrics based on realized capitalization are suggesting a reduction in market liquidity, signaling a possible reversal of the bullish trend for the largest cryptocurrency, as highlighted by the expert in his technical analysis.
“I’ve been predicting a bull market for the past two years, even when the metrics were borderline bearish. Sorry to change my mind, but it now seems pretty clear that we’re entering a bear market. Realized cap-based metrics show a lack of new liquidity. The massive volume around 100k failed to lift the price, and ETF inflows have been negative for three weeks in a row. I can’t keep sharing my hopes when the data keeps signaling bearish. I’m not going to sell BTC and still hold my position,” he added.
At the time of publication, the price of Bitcoin was quoted at US$81.691,54, down 1.6% in the last 24 hours.
Despite correction, Bitcoin leads global market after Trump election
Despite recent corrections in the cryptocurrency market, the largest crypto asset, Bitcoin (BTC), has demonstrated remarkable resilience, overcoming the performance of other major global assets such as stocks, U.S. Treasuries and precious metals, according to market data shared today.
This performance occurs even in a period of volatility, marked by a 23% correction in relation to its historical high recorded on January 20, the day of the inauguration of US President Donald Trump.
Thomas Fahrer, co-founder of Apollo Sats, shared data from Bloomberg that confirms Bitcoin’s superiority over other market segments, including real estate. “Even with the pullback, Bitcoin still outperforms all other assets post-election. Pure alpha,” Fahrer said in a post on X on March 18.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports
Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?
Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.
