Lido DAO votes to enable dual governance, giving stakers veto power
2025/06/27 16:00
The governance DAO of Lido, Ethereum's largest liquid staking protocol that currently manages over a quarter of all staked ETH, is set to give its stakers the ability to delay or veto governance decisions following a near-unanimous vote.
The dual governance system is intended to safeguard against a scenario where Lido's LDO token holders, who are the only ones allowed to create and vote in favor of governance proposals for the Lido DAO, attempt to vote in a proposal that would negatively affect Lido's stakers or Ethereum itself.
In the new paradigm, Lido stakers (those who hold stETH tokens) will be able to register dissent against DAO proposals by depositing stETH into an escrow contract. If at least 1% of Lido’s total staked ETH is deposited in the escrow by dissenting stETH holders, the proposal is delayed for an initial period of 5 days, with the time delay increasing as more stETH tokens are deposited.
If 10% of the total stETH supply is locked, the proposal is frozen and the protocol enters a Rage-Quit state —no new proposals can execute until dissenting stakers have fully withdrawn or the DAO drops the measure.
The unique structure, which has been discussed for years , grants stakers the ability to object to controversial proposals, and gives them enough time to rally support for the cause. Lido called the vote "one of the most important protocol upgrades across the Lido ecosystem" in a post on X .
The main phase of voting for the proposal ended with 53.6 million LDO tokens voting in favor, narrowly surpassing the 50 million LDO needed for quorum, and just 1.18 LDO opposed, from a single dissenter. Turnout was in line with previous Lido DAO ballots, which often clear the 50 million-token quorum by only a few million despite near-unanimous support. Barring a massive last-minute organized opposition to the vote during the "objection" phase, which only allows LDO holders to either vote "No" or change their vote from "Yes" to "No," the vote will finalize on June 30 at 10:00 EDT.
"Dual governance isn't perfect, but it solves important problems," Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin wrote on X . Buterin said the structure serves as an extra independent layer against "particularly harmful actions," and also explicitly allows Ethereum stakers to serve as stakeholders in the Lido ecosystem.
The price of LDO has risen about 3.5% in the past 24 hours, according to The Block's LDO Price page , compared to a 0.8% gain in the price of ETH. About 25.7% of staked ETH is staked with Lido, according to a Dune dashboard .
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Deutsche Bank: The "fifth wave of tech stock rally" in US stocks since late July has peaked, prepare for a "V-shaped reversal"
Deutsche Bank has downgraded its rating on US technology stocks from overweight to neutral, noting that the fifth round of tech stock rally since July 29 is approaching the upper boundary of the long-term trend channel. The current upside potential is only about 4 percentage points, while historical trends indicate downside risks could reach 16 percentage points. Funds are expected to rotate into other sectors, and the European market, with its lower tech exposure, is likely to benefit relatively. However, Deutsche Bank emphasized that the long-term outperformance trend of technology stocks remains unchanged.
How expensive is AI computing power rental in the US? "Spot price" is twice that of long-term contracts, and four times the return threshold for cloud service providers.
The short-term spot leasing price for AI computing power reaches as high as $40 to $50 billion per gigawatt per year, while the price for long-term contracts is only $20 billion per year, and the breakeven threshold for supercomputing cloud operators is around $12 billion per year. However, according to Goldman Sachs, the fundamental reason why hyperscale cloud providers like Google rent computing power at such significant premiums is that their in-house capacity cannot keep up; once their own capacity catches up, the spot premium will disappear.

‘More bullish on Bitcoin’ – Strategy leads 91% of corporate BTC buying
RealFi Could Change How Crypto Reaches the Unbanked: 5 Best Coins Worth Having Before Adoption Accelerates
