The Journey of Hyperliquid (Part 2): Sprouting
Chainfeeds Guide:
Assets on HyperEVM are still a reissuance channel for HYPE, and it is still a long way from becoming an independent ecosystem.
Source:
Author:
Zuo Ye
Opinion:
Zuo Ye: Hyperliquid has allied with market makers to provide initial liquidity for HyperCore, but all of this is built on expectations for $HYPE—market makers exchange tokens for long-term profit sharing. The expansion method for HyperBFT nodes is through reallocation, meaning the foundation gradually transfers token shares to market maker nodes to bind their long-term commitment through shared interests. As a result, $HYPE becomes the core liability of Hyperliquid, needing to simultaneously satisfy the demands of market makers, HLP, and token holders. However, these three parties have conflicting interests: if the price of $HYPE stagnates for a long time, retail investors will sell, causing losses for market makers; if the price surges, it could trigger whale cash-outs and systemic risks. Therefore, the team chooses to keep $HYPE fluctuating around the $50 range, a price that retains appreciation potential while maintaining low downside pressure during bear markets. Hyperliquid’s strategy is not to sell liquidity directly, but to package it as a security asset in exchange for node trust and commitment. This security-centric sales logic serves as an important transition before the launch of HyperEVM and lays the foundation for the future token economic system. After Hyperliquid successfully replicated CEX liquidity with HyperCore, it began building an open public chain architecture, allowing $HYPE to become more than just an incentive token and gradually gain real consumption scenarios. However, according to App Capital data, capital flows on HyperEVM still mainly come from $HYPE reissuance and derivative assets, and the ecosystem has yet to form an independent endogenous cycle. LST, lending, and yield protocols are mostly centered around $HYPE, while neutral infrastructure like DEXs struggle to gain traction. Take Kinetiq as an example: it acts like an on-chain reissuer, developing LST, lending, and stablecoin businesses by wrapping $HYPE, and also participates in protocol revenue distribution as a HyperBFT node. In contrast, HyperEVM’s main DEX—HyperSwap—has a TVL of only about $44 million, far below the liquidity levels of mainstream public chains. This means HyperEVM is currently still a leverage amplifier for $HYPE rather than an independent ecosystem. For Hyperliquid to replicate Ethereum’s open growth, $HYPE must shift from buyback support to real consumption, forming a positive cycle through protocol usage and trading activity; otherwise, the relationship between the token and liquidity remains a one-way dependency. Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 proposal and CoreWriter System form a value bridge between HyperEVM and HyperCore. HIP-3 allows users to create their own contract markets on HyperCore, including prediction markets, forex, and options, with each project required to stake 500,000 $HYPE as collateral. On the surface, this is a decentralized auction mechanism, but in reality, the CoreWriter system establishes a cyclical leverage relationship between HyperEVM and HyperCore—$HYPE generated in the ecosystem flows back to HyperCore, resulting in de facto deflation. The crowdfunding model initiated by Kinetiq further strengthens this cycle: project teams raise funds to participate in auctions, and after deployment, must pay fees in $HYPE and share 50% of the profits with Hyperliquid; if violations occur, the staked $HYPE will be confiscated. In this way, trading activity on HyperEVM ultimately translates into value support for HyperCore. It can be said that Hyperliquid, through open access and mandatory staking mechanisms, achieves a closed-loop amplification of token value. HIP-3 not only redefines the economic model of $HYPE, but also marks Hyperliquid’s transition from a single matching system to a hybrid of public chain and exchange, laying the structural foundation for it to become the next Binance-like platform.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Credit panic hits AI trading: CoreWeave bond yields remain high, Nasdaq posts biggest weekly drop since late June
Concerns over the debt risk of AI infrastructure companies continue to rise. Yields on some CoreWeave bonds briefly exceeded 15% on Thursday and remained elevated on Friday. CoreWeave's stock price plunged another 12% on Friday, and the Nasdaq Composite Index fell about 4.5% for the week. Analysts point out that as capital costs rise to unbearable levels, companies will have no choice but to reduce their capital expenditures.
Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Experiences Longest Losing Streak Since 2008; Jensen Huang Responds Calmly: Short-term Fluctuations Won't Change AI's Long-term Growth Prospects
Despite recent sell-offs in AI-related stocks, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang remains confident in the long-term prospects of the AI industry.
U.S. chip stocks drop for eight consecutive sessions! $2 trillion wiped out in market value, marking the longest losing streak since 2008
This week, the investment prospects of AI were questioned by the market. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell by 11.4%, and the Nasdaq dropped more than 4% in a single week. CoreWeave's stock price fell over 25% during the week, and its bonds dropped to distressed levels, casting doubt on the high-yield debt financing model. Strategists warned that being overly bearish could lead to missing opportunities, while "Wood Sister" bucked the trend and increased her holdings of CoreWeave.
In August, overseas funds returned to the U.S. Treasury market; UK holdings surpassed $1 trillion for the first time; Japan and China continued to reduce holdings, with China’s U.S. Treasury holdings hitting the lowest level since 2008
According to a report by the U.S. Treasury Department, overseas investors made net purchases of $108.9 billion in U.S. Treasury bonds in August, reversing a two-month decline in holdings. Among the top ten countries and regions holding U.S. debt, only China and Japan reduced their holdings in August. Japan, the largest holder, saw its holdings drop for the fourth consecutive month, reaching a 22-month low in the same month it intervened in the foreign exchange market. China’s holdings declined for the third straight month, hitting new lows for two consecutive months not seen since 2008. The UK, the second-largest holder, posted historic highs for two consecutive months. Canada recorded the largest increase in August, up $38.3 billion, ranking fifth overall. Belgium had the second-largest increase, up $19.8 billion.

