One of Tesla's top ten shareholders challenges Musk's trillion-dollar compensation plan
Ahead of Tesla's annual shareholders meeting, Norway's sovereign wealth fund, with assets totaling 1.9 trillion, has publicly opposed Elon Musk's 100 million compensation package. Musk previously threatened to resign if the proposal was not approved.
Norway's $1.9 trillion sovereign wealth fund has become the first major investor to publicly oppose Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk's newly proposed $1 trillion compensation package.
The investment arm of Norges Bank—Norges Bank Investment Management—voiced concerns about the scale of the compensation plan on Tuesday.
“While we recognize Mr. Musk’s visionary leadership has created significant value for the company, we are concerned about the overall size of the award, the issue of equity dilution, and the lack of mitigation of key person risk—this is consistent with our longstanding position on executive compensation,” the department said in a statement. “We will continue to engage in constructive dialogue with Tesla on this and other matters.”
On Thursday, November 6, Tesla will hold its annual shareholder meeting and announce the results of several proposals, including Musk’s compensation plan. According to the plan, if Musk can raise Tesla’s valuation to $8.5 trillion (nearly eight times its current value) over the next decade, he will receive an additional 12% stake in Tesla. At that point, the value of the compensation package would slightly exceed $1 trillion.
Tesla Chair Robyn Denholm believes this vote is crucial to retaining Musk as CEO. Musk has publicly threatened that if shareholders reject his compensation plan again, he will resign.
Last year, Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, one of Tesla’s top ten shareholders (holding 1.1%), voted against Musk’s then $56 billion compensation plan—the largest executive compensation plan in U.S. corporate history. Although the $56 billion plan was approved by shareholders in June last year, it was struck down for a second time by a Delaware court in December.
Two major shareholder advisory firms—Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS)—have both recommended that investors reject the latest $1 trillion compensation plan. The plan is tied to ambitious milestones for Tesla’s stock price and operational performance.
A group of large pension funds have also issued an open letter opposing the compensation plan, stating that the Tesla board’s “obsession with retaining the CEO” has damaged the company’s reputation and led to excessive executive compensation.
Norway’s sovereign wealth fund has previously drawn Musk’s ire over compensation issues. Earlier this year, the fund’s CEO Nicolai Tangen invited Musk and other CEOs to dinner in Oslo, but after the fund voted against the $56 billion compensation plan, Musk declined the invitation.
“When I rarely ask you for help and you refuse, you shouldn’t ask me for anything until you take real action to make amends. Friends should help each other.” Musk said in a text message to Tangen in October 2024. The message was disclosed by Norway’s sovereign wealth fund in response to a freedom of information request.
The Norwegian fund usually announces its voting intentions five days before a company’s annual shareholder meeting, but this time, it released its voting intentions for Tesla only two days in advance. The fund stated that this was to “ensure all relevant information had been obtained and could be included in our analysis.”
Last month, Musk addressed criticism of the compensation plan on his social platform X, writing: “Tesla’s market value exceeds that of all other car companies combined. Which company’s CEO would you want to run Tesla? It certainly wouldn’t be me.” He also referred to ISS and Glass Lewis as “corporate terrorists.”
The wealth of the world’s richest man is mainly concentrated in Tesla stock. Over the past five years, Tesla’s share price has more than doubled, with its market value soaring to $1.5 trillion.
Last month, Denholm told the Financial Times that if Tesla fails to retain Musk, “it would not be a good outcome for shareholders,” but she added that if Tesla loses this vote, she does not believe Musk will take any “sudden and harmful” action.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
10-year Yield Plunges 17 Basis Points in One Week! AI Trading Turbulence Rekindles Safe-Haven Appeal of US Treasuries
AI trading has loosened, reactivating the safe-haven attribute of US Treasury bonds. Last week, the 10-year yield dropped 17 basis points in a single week, synchronizing with the decline in tech stocks—a phenomenon not seen since the tariff storm in April 2025. The unusually concentrated short positions amplified the bond market rally, and large-scale short-covering by CTA funds has also become a key driver in this round of bond rebound.
From Digital Assets to Reshaping Financial Pipelines! BlackRock (BLK.US) Accelerates Integration of Tokenized Funds into the Core of Wall Street
Wall Street’s embrace of blockchain technology is moving beyond simply creating digital versions of stocks, bonds, and money market funds, aiming instead for a broader goal—to transform the way these assets circulate within the financial system.

AI bubble alarm rings across Wall Street! Oaktree Capital's Marks disagrees: The market hasn't reached its most dangerous moment yet, and investors are not completely oblivious to risks.
Although investors are displaying typical FOMO (fear of missing out) sentiment regarding further gains in tech stocks, the market continues to draw comparisons between the current situation and past bubbles, indicating that investors are not unaware of the risks.

Barclays: Dual restrictions of physical and capital, data center growth will slow significantly in 2027!
Barclays' latest report reveals that the global data center construction boom is approaching a turning point—the year-on-year growth rate of new capacity will plummet from over 100% in 2026 to about 35% in 2027, and stabilize by 2028. Facing both physical constraints and tightened financing, hyperscale cloud providers will absorb more than 60% of new capacity, while the risk of project suspension for small and medium developers will sharply increase.

