OCC Confirms Legality of Custodial Services Provided by National Trust Banks
The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) stated that national trust banks had the legal authority to offer non-fiduciary custodial services for decades, warning that rejecting new applications due to digital assets would jeopardize operations exceeding $2 trillion.
Jonathan Gould, Comptroller of the OCC, said during his speech at the Blockchain Association Policy Summit 2025 that the agency is reviewing several applications to establish national trust banks and intends to ensure fair competition between existing and new market participants, including companies offering digital asset services. According to him, custodial and related services have long been part of the permitted activities of trust banks, and digital assets shouldn’t be treated as an exception.
He reminded the audience that the OCC has had the authority to issue national trust charters since 1978 and currently oversees around 60 such institutions. In Q3 2025, national trust banks reported nearly $2 trillion in non-fiduciary custodial assets under management, accounting for about 25% of their combined total assets.
He noted that claims by opponents of new applications, suggesting that custodial services contradict OCC precedent, aren’t supported by facts. He said that restricting such operations would require revisiting long-established activities and would effectively disrupt work measured in the trillions of dollars.
Gould emphasized that the U.S. banking system evolved from the telegraph to blockchain, and regulators shouldn’t artificially constrain banks with outdated technologies. He pointed out that many states, including New York and South Dakota, already allow their trust companies to offer digital asset custody services.
He gave special attention to banks’ concerns about “unfair competition” and supervisory risks. According to him, the OCC has many years of experience supervising both traditional trust bank operations and the activities of national trust banks focused on cryptocurrencies, and is therefore prepared to oversee new institutions reliably and impartially.
Gould also announced plans to combat the practice of debanking. The OCC created a public mechanism for submitting complaints from customers and companies who believe they were unjustifiably denied banking services. The regulator removed the notion of “reputational risk” from its guidance documents and, together with the FDIC, proposed removing it from regulations, as it was often used as a formal pretext to refuse service to lawful businesses.
In March 2025, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) significantly simplified the regulatory environment for banks operating in the crypto sector.
The OCC head also confirmed that the agency is reviewing the nine largest national banks for potential restrictions on providing services to clients from politically sensitive or innovative industries, including digital assets.
Commenting on the implementation of the GENIUS Act, which establishes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, the official noted that the OCC is prepared to develop a “measured and flexible” supervisory system. The regulator expects broad public feedback, as many issues will require detailed study and likely subsequent rule adjustments in line with technological progress.
In closing, Gould stressed that the OCC will oppose attempts to undermine diversity and competition within the banking system: “Innovation, competition, and fair access must prevail over regulatory stagnation.”
Several applications for national trust bank charters enabling federal-level crypto operations are currently under OCC review. Applicants include entities associated with Sony, Stripe, Coinbase, Ripple, Paxos, Circle, and several other companies.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The Biggest Winner in the AI Fundraising Frenzy: Goldman Sachs Remains the King of Wall Street
In a single day, three AI mega financing deals totaling over $210 billion took place, and Goldman Sachs’ name appeared in each one: co-leading Meta’s $95 billion stock offering, exclusively overseeing the $40 billion chip financing structure for SpaceX, and serving as the lead bookrunner for Anthropic’s IPO. The AI financing supercycle is reshaping the competitive landscape on Wall Street, with Goldman Sachs taking the lead in turning relationship advantages into real money.

Anthropic may secure the "largest IPO in the stock market," but may not achieve "investment grade in the bond market"
The prospectus reveals that the company is already burdened with $6.2 billion in current liabilities, and its uninitiated lease commitments have soared from $50 billion to $321 billion, with an additional $77 billion in hidden borrowing options. The off-balance-sheet "chip financing" structure it has built in partnership with Broadcom is considered a potential counterparty risk due to circular trading. In comparison, SpaceX made a clear commitment to an investment-grade credit rating and successfully completed a $25 billion bond issuance. Anthropic, however, has barely mentioned an investment-grade credit rating, making it difficult for bond market buyers to price its offerings.
Goldman Sachs Connects $210 Billion Financing in One Day! AI 'Capital Relay' Boosts Confidence, Semiconductor Bull Market Narrative Strengthened
Goldman's $210 billion trading day was driven by the artificial intelligence financing boom. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. co-led Meta Platforms Inc.'s $95 billion equity offering, served as the sole structuring agent for SpaceX's $40 billion chip financing deal, and was appointed as the lead underwriter for Anthropic PBC's initial public offering. These deals have brought an unexpected windfall for Goldman, which is likely to earn at least tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions, of dollars as a result.
