ABA survey finds consumers support stablecoin yield limits tied to banking risk
A new American Bankers Association survey found that a large minority of respondents will agree with theoretical restrictions on stablecoin yield if the question raises the spectre of resulting financial risk.
On Tuesday, the largest and oldest U.S. banking industry trade association published the results of a recent survey meant to gauge consumer views of stablecoins and fintech innovation, as well as their regulatory preferences.
By a purported 3-to-1 margin, consumers are said to agree with congressional prohibitions on stablecoin rewards “if there is any risk it could reduce the amount of funds available to banks to lend in the community and support economic growth.”
Moreover, consumers agree by a 6-to-1 margin that stablecoin laws “should be cautious and not take any steps that could undermine our existing financial system,” particularly “community banks that help drive local economic activity.”
The ABA’s survey, conducted by Morning Consult, comes as U.S. lawmakers are hamstrung in their efforts to pass broad crypto market structure legislation due to, in part, banking industry lobbying against stablecoin yield.
Banks, including giants like JPMorgan and down to local credit unions, have argued that stablecoin issuers offering rewards to holders could undermine the U.S. banking and local lending systems by drawing deposits away from lower-yielding bank accounts.
“Our industry welcomes competition and innovation, and many banks are eager to offer products and services in the digital asset marketplace.” ABA President and CEO Rob Nichols said at the ABA’s 2026 Washington Summit on Tuesday. “What we don’t support is an uneven playing field where new entrants want to offer banklike products without having to comply with banklike rules, or even worse, push for a regulatory framework that puts consumers, the financial system, and the economy at risk.”
The 'level playing field'
Nichols’ comments echo similar remarks from JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, who said crypto firms should follow the same capital, liquidity, transparency, and reporting requirements on “ a level playing field ” as banks if they’re going to pay interest on stablecoin holdings.
Crypto market advocates, including Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, have argued that stablecoin issuers follow stricter reserve requirements than banks as mandated by the GENIUS Act, which requires all issued stablecoins to be fully backed by cash or cash equivalents.
Even President Donald Trump has weighed in on the issue, having last week referred to the matter of stablecoin yield as an issue of consumer choice , while attempting to bring banks to the table.
Indeed, many banks are beginning to experiment with stablecoins or similar products. JPMorgan, for instance, is developing tokens backed by actual bank deposits, while the largest credit union infrastructure provider, TruStage , is developing a stablecoin.
This is happening as crypto native firms are receiving conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to operate as federally chartered banks, which would allow them to custody stablecoins and fiat reserve assets.
The OCC also recently outlined how it might supervise stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act.
Broader stablecoin yield issue
While the ABA’s survey reportedly found that 84% of respondents agree that “a business providing bank-like services” should follow bank-like rules, 43% said they “don’t know” whether Congress should prevent stablecoin issuers from paying yield.
Longtime crypto lawyer Jake Chervinsky, who recently co-founded the Hyperliquid Policy Center, said the split between banking and the crypto industries likely won’t stop at stablecoin yield and could eventually threaten other blockchain-based services , like peer-to-peer lending.
“Don't make the mistake of thinking the banks only care about stablecoin yield,” Chervinsky said in response to an ABA conference clip. “The quiet part out loud: ‘Holding payment stablecoin, creating liquidity in that DeFi world, that's part of the crypto roadmap, but that's not okay.’ Stop them now, or they're coming for DeFi next.”
Though for many consumers, the debate may seem quite abstract, given the reportedly low levels of actual stablecoin adoption. According to the ABA survey, 80% of respondents said they have never owned a stablecoin, while 48% said they are “very unlikely” to buy, hold or use stablecoins in the next 12 months.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Intel (INTC.US) Decline Continues: PC Slowdown Is Just the Trigger, Foundry Dilemma Is the Main Issue
Intel (INTC.US) is facing increasing pressure to get its struggling foundry business off the ground.

Palantir (PLTR.US) commercial revenue surpasses government for the first time, annual forecast revised up to $8.53 billion
Palantir’s Q3 revenue increased by 96% year-on-year to $2.31 billion, with its commercial business surpassing government contracts for the first time. CEO Karp stated that demand for sovereign AI remains strong, and the company raised its full-year revenue guidance to $8.53 billion. Despite stock price volatility after hours, both profit indicators exceeded expectations.
US and Iran Show 'Willingness to Negotiate', Causing Global Energy Prices to Plummet
Iran's Supreme Leader has authorized the government to negotiate, while Trump has explicitly stated he "will not" resume military strikes if re-elected. The energy market is under pressure across the board: Brent crude plummeted over 6% in a single day, WTI fell below the $100 mark, and European benchmark natural gas futures at one point plunged nearly 11%. With the US election approaching, Trump faces both electoral challenges and pressure from Israel to initiate conflict. Iran has proposed a "seven-day plan" as its bottom line for reopening the Strait, with substantial underlying disagreements. Coupled with a sharp global inventory reduction of nearly 1 billion barrels, the downside for oil prices may be limited.

Apple (AAPL.US) doesn't burn money. Is the AI sell-off "safe haven" really secure?
Apple, which does not participate in the AI arms race, has become a "safe haven" amid the AI sell-off; however, with its high valuation, Apple also faces a judgment on its growth.
