The US CLARITY Act, seen as a key effort to regulate cryptocurrencies, faces renewed uncertainty after another delay in Congress. Despite clearing the Senate Banking Committee with a 15-9 vote, the bill failed to reach a full Senate vote due to an overwhelmed legislative calendar. This setback heightens uncertainty and concern within the crypto sector as lawmakers prepare for a summer recess and the upcoming midterm elections.
Clarity act vote delayed again as US Congress stalls
Bill stuck on the House calendar
Although the CLARITY Act received rare bipartisan support and approval in the Senate Banking Committee, it was unexpectedly postponed before reaching the Senate floor. The Senate’s packed agenda, dominated by budget discussions and funding issues, has squeezed out consideration of crypto bills. Similarly, the House of Representatives is bogged down by its own busy schedule. With both chambers out until June 28 and facing priority legislation upon return, any progress on crypto policy in the short term appears unlikely.
Senator Cynthia Lummis has warned that if this opportunity is missed, US lawmakers could delay meaningful crypto legislation as far as 2030. She cautioned that changes in the political landscape could undermine years of bipartisan efforts.
Washington sources confirm that ongoing budget negotiations and mounting international crises have kept the CLARITY Act and similar digital asset regulations on the sidelines. The repeated deferrals threaten to postpone the much-needed legal framework for digital assets in the US for years.
US lags in global competition as industry worries grow
Industry insiders note a recurring pattern in the US: legislation for digital assets advances through committees but is repeatedly stalled when it comes to a final vote. These repeated delays only increase uncertainty for companies and investors already navigating vague and incomplete regulations.
One of the core aims of the CLARITY Act is to clarify the jurisdictional split between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regarding digital assets. Currently, crypto companies in the US face confusing regulatory boundaries and inconsistent oversight. This environment has prompted many firms to consider relocating to countries with clearer legal frameworks.
Glossary: The CLARITY Act is a comprehensive legislative proposal designed to establish clear regulatory guidelines for digital assets and cryptocurrencies in the US, precisely delineating the authorities of agencies like the SEC and CFTC.
Meanwhile, Europe’s MiCA crypto regulations are advancing rapidly, attracting international investment and innovation. The slow pace of US legislation is prompting tech startups and capital to migrate to markets with clearer rules, where regulatory certainty is seen as a competitive advantage.
| Scope | Digital assets, SEC and CFTC authorities | Crypto asset service providers, investor protection |
| Legislative process | Committee approved, stalled before floor vote | Adopted, being implemented in phases |
| Investor protection | No law yet in effect | Protective measures enforced |
Representative Tom Emmer from the House says bipartisan support for the sector remains strong and momentum persists. However, the crowded legislative agenda presents a formidable obstacle that optimism alone cannot overcome. The coming weeks represent a narrow but crucial window for US crypto policy decisions.
For the crypto sector, these ongoing delays suggest that US regulatory clarity may remain elusive for the foreseeable future. As other regions forge ahead, industry leaders express mounting frustration at the slow pace of progress in Washington.
This legislative gridlock could erode the US’s leadership in fintech and digital innovation as more crypto projects seek stability and growth opportunities in better-regulated markets abroad.
Observers caution that if Congress cannot prioritize the CLARITY Act soon, the US risks falling further behind in the global race to regulate and harness digital assets safely and transparently.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Gold price holds critical $4,100 support, but can it break $4,200 as inflation risks loom?
Hinkal joins Mastercard Crypto Partner Program for private stablecoin payments
Chipmaker earnings growth cools to 136% as AI boom lifts S&P 500
Updated: Delta Air Lines warns that as fuel prices hit profits, airline capacity will tighten further
Delta Airlines lowers its annual profit forecast due to an expected increase in fuel costs to $6 billion. The CEO stated that ticket prices have risen by about 20% this year, with limited passenger resistance. Analysts warn that maintaining high ticket prices in 2027 is critical for improving profitability. The article includes comments from the earnings call and analyst remarks. Rajesh Kumar Singh/Shivansh Tiwary, Reuters Chicago, October 9 - Delta Airlines (DAL.N) said on Friday that, despite strong travel demand and rising ticket prices, soaring fuel costs have forced it to cut its 2026 profit expectations by nearly a quarter. So, the airline industry may need to further limit flight growth next year to protect profitability. This warning highlights the increasingly tough challenges faced by U.S. airlines. While strong demand and restricted seat growth have allowed airlines to significantly raise ticket prices and offset higher fuel costs, aggressively increasing flights to capture more demand may intensify competition, making it harder to maintain high fares and protect profits. Based in Atlanta, Delta now expects its annual fuel expenditure to increase by about $6 billion compared to last year—about $2 billion higher than its July forecast—due to the Iran war (link) causing global jet fuel prices to spike. Airlines worldwide are preparing for a prolonged fuel shock. Michael O’Leary, CEO of Ryanair Group RYA.I, said Thursday that high jet fuel prices could persist for another 12-18 months (link), adding more pressure on airlines to raise fares and control costs. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/AUTOMATED-20261008/A4A-JET-FUEL-DAILY-1Y/xmpjwjnmbvr/chart.png “In a high-cost environment, you can’t simply grow your way out,” Delta CEO Ed Bastian said on the earnings call. He noted that the industry has already taken steps to restrict capacity, but more measures will be needed next year to improve profitability. Bastian said Delta raised ticket prices about 20% this year, and passenger resistance has been limited. He is confident that even if fuel costs eventually drop, the high fares can still be maintained. Delta lowered its adjusted annual earnings per share forecast from the July prediction of $6.50-$7.50 to $5.10-$5.60. According to LSEG data, the midpoint of the new range is below analysts’ average expectation of $5.46. Third-quarter adjusted earnings per share were $1.72, four cents below analysts’ average forecast. In midday trading, shares of Delta dropped 1.7%, United Airlines UAL.O fell 1.4%, and both American Airlines AAL.O and Southwest Airlines LUV.N were down about 1%. Delta partly shields itself from rising fuel costs by owning a refinery outside Philadelphia (link), which is expected to generate over $700 million in profits this year. Even with this buffer, the airline expects its fourth-quarter fuel price to rise from $3.61 per gallon in Q3 to $4.25 per gallon. Delta forecasts adjusted fourth-quarter earnings per share to be between $1.15-$1.65, with the $1.40 midpoint roughly matching analysts’ average expectation of $1.39. Fare increases Government data shows that in the first eight months of 2026, U.S. airlines spent $42.9 billion on fuel, an increase of $13.2 billion compared to the same period last year despite slightly reduced consumption. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, strong demand and limited seat growth pushed average U.S. airline ticket prices up by about 25% year-on-year between April and August. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-AIRLINES/FUEL/lbpgdnbzwvq/chart.png Analysts at Melius Research said that despite surging fuel costs, Delta’s ability to raise fares helps keep second-half profits roughly stable. Still, they warn that the company’s profit margin has struggled to improve over the years. “It is critical for margin improvement to maintain or raise fares in 2027,” they wrote in their research report. With industry capacity growth expected to accelerate in Q4, this challenge will likely become even tougher. Deutsche Bank analysts expect the proportion of fuel costs recouped through revenue measures to fall in Q4 and predict full recovery won’t happen until early 2027. Bastian noted that low industry returns are another reason for limiting capacity growth. He said Delta will be cautious with its 2027 capacity plan until the fuel price outlook becomes clearer. He added that international routes may account for a larger share of Delta’s capacity expansion compared to domestic routes. Currently, Delta says its premium cabins and corporate travel business remain strong, and its economy cabin business is gradually improving. With Q4 ticket bookings already exceeding 60%, Delta expects revenue to increase about 20% year-on-year, despite limited capacity growth. Executives said early booking trends for Q1 2027 are also encouraging. (For the convenience of non-native English speakers, Reuters automatically translates its reports into several
