Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
1 smart money bet $48,100 that the valuation of Anthropic would reach $1.75 trillion by December 31st.

1 smart money bet $48,100 that the valuation of Anthropic would reach $1.75 trillion by December 31st.

BlockBeatsBlockBeats2026/05/25 06:01

According to PolyBeats monitoring, on the prediction market Polymarket, a wise money bet on "Will Anthropic's valuation reach (HIGH) $1.75 trillion by December 31st?" with $48,100 "Yes," with an average buy-in probability of 44.2%, and the current "Yes" probability is 61.5%.

Address 0x8a4c788f bet $48,100, with the top related category in this market being Financials, with a net profit of $62,900. The user has a 100% win rate in this category with 9 settled trades, out of which 1 trade had a buy price below $0.8 and a sell price above $0.95.

The market rules stipulate referencing the Nasdaq Private Market's NPM Price: settlement will be "Yes" if Anthropic achieves or exceeds a private valuation of $1.75T on any trading day within the year. If the company IPOs or direct lists before year-end, the IPO pricing and post-listing market cap will also be considered.

On May 20th, Reuters reported that Anthropic disclosed a possibility of Q2 revenue reaching $10.9 billion, up from Q1's $4.8 billion, with a projected operating profit of about $559 million for the first time; the report also mentioned that Anthropic is set to pay SpaceX a monthly $1.25 billion computing fee until May 2029.

The current public perception widely indicates that Anthropic's growth narrative has shifted from a "burn-rate model company" to "high revenue growth, strong enterprise clients, and compute bottleneck resolvable by capital." Analysts believe that if a new financing round of around $90 billion lands by the end of May or in June, the NPM or other private prices may continue to reference scarce equity transactions, IPO expectations, and secondary market markup.

Note: Based on their historical trading behavior, the trader is not necessarily betting on the outcome of events but may engage in profit-taking or stop-loss actions at certain points after opening a position.

Account:
0x8a4c788f043023b8b28a762216d037e9f148532b.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

U.S. Stocks Move | Trex Bio (TRXB.US) Debuts on the U.S. Stock Market, Drops Over 1.3% After Opening

As of press time, the stock has fallen by over 1.3%, trading at $13.805.

智通财经•2026/10/09 16:32

BUZZ - Broker Perspectives: Analysts Express Doubts Over Starbucks and Chipotle Acquisition

Latest Update October 9 – The Financial Times reported on Thursday that Starbucks (SBUX.O) has explored a potential acquisition of Chipotle (CMG.N). This move would bring CEO Brian Niccol back to the Mexican burrito chain he once led. Starbucks declined to comment, saying the company remains "fully focused" on its business turnaround. Chipotle's stock fell about 4% to $31.32 on Friday, after surging 6.2% in the previous trading session. Limited strategic rationale BTIG expressed "high skepticism," stating that the deal does not make sense operationally, would cause significant dilution for Starbucks shareholders, and would disrupt management operations. "Over the years we've heard many stories about multi-brand acquisitions... but few have materialized, and even fewer have succeeded," BTIG noted. William Blair pointed out that Starbucks’ $9.4 billion net debt as of June makes it difficult to finance an acquisition and could push the combined company’s leverage ratio to about six times—considered high for the restaurant industry. D.A. Davidson stated the probability of the deal succeeding is 20% or less, given the significant differences between the brands and the apparent lack of clear synergies. Raymond James noted that due to the low overlap in menus, supply chain benefits are likely limited, while performance among multi-brand restaurant platforms has been mixed. eMarketer’s Suzy Davidkhanian commented that Niccol's familiarity may reduce execution risk, but investors might still see the deal as a "costly distraction" during Starbucks’ transformation. (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters automatically translates its reports into several other languages. Automated translation may be inaccurate or fail to include necessary context; Reuters does not guarantee the accuracy of automated translated text and provides it solely for readers’ convenience. Reuters accepts no responsibility for any damage or loss resulting from the use of automated translation functions.)

路透社•2026/10/09 16:16