Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
“Lost and Found” or “Legal Loophole”? New York Lawsuit Battles Over 39,000 Dormant Bitcoin Wallets

“Lost and Found” or “Legal Loophole”? New York Lawsuit Battles Over 39,000 Dormant Bitcoin Wallets

BlockBeatsBlockBeats2026/05/25 11:02
Show original

BlockBeats reported on May 25 that a lawsuit filed in New York on May 1 is seeking a court ruling to claim ownership of 39,069 long-dormant Bitcoin wallets, raising major legal questions regarding lost crypto assets and property law.


The plaintiff, Noah Doe, and two Wyoming limited liability companies (ABC Company and XYZ Company) claim that the Bitcoins associated with these addresses are “abandoned” property found in accordance with the law, and have reported them to the New York Police Department under New York's lost property law. The lawsuit includes wallets of early Bitcoin miners and even addresses of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto.


However, the legal basis of the lawsuit is questionable. Even if the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, enforcement is technically impossible, because the Bitcoin network does not have a mechanism for “redistributing funds without a private key.” Analysts at research institution Castle Labs noted that the only exception would be if the coins were transferred to a regulated custodian or trading platform, in which case the court could force the intermediary to act.


The lawsuit lists a total of 39,069 Bitcoin addresses, but the founder of on-chain analytics platform Timechain Index estimates these addresses hold about 3.7 million Bitcoins (worth approximately $285 billion), far more than plaintiffs claim. Analysts also noted that the plaintiffs sent legal notices to address formats unrelated to the actual balances, a structurally flawed attempt. Data shows there are currently 3.5 million Bitcoins that have been dormant for 10 years and 6.6 million that have been dormant for more than 5 years.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

U.S. Stocks Move | Trex Bio (TRXB.US) Debuts on the U.S. Stock Market, Drops Over 1.3% After Opening

As of press time, the stock has fallen by over 1.3%, trading at $13.805.

智通财经•2026/10/09 16:32

BUZZ - Broker Perspectives: Analysts Express Doubts Over Starbucks and Chipotle Acquisition

Latest Update October 9 – The Financial Times reported on Thursday that Starbucks (SBUX.O) has explored a potential acquisition of Chipotle (CMG.N). This move would bring CEO Brian Niccol back to the Mexican burrito chain he once led. Starbucks declined to comment, saying the company remains "fully focused" on its business turnaround. Chipotle's stock fell about 4% to $31.32 on Friday, after surging 6.2% in the previous trading session. Limited strategic rationale BTIG expressed "high skepticism," stating that the deal does not make sense operationally, would cause significant dilution for Starbucks shareholders, and would disrupt management operations. "Over the years we've heard many stories about multi-brand acquisitions... but few have materialized, and even fewer have succeeded," BTIG noted. William Blair pointed out that Starbucks’ $9.4 billion net debt as of June makes it difficult to finance an acquisition and could push the combined company’s leverage ratio to about six times—considered high for the restaurant industry. D.A. Davidson stated the probability of the deal succeeding is 20% or less, given the significant differences between the brands and the apparent lack of clear synergies. Raymond James noted that due to the low overlap in menus, supply chain benefits are likely limited, while performance among multi-brand restaurant platforms has been mixed. eMarketer’s Suzy Davidkhanian commented that Niccol's familiarity may reduce execution risk, but investors might still see the deal as a "costly distraction" during Starbucks’ transformation. (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters automatically translates its reports into several other languages. Automated translation may be inaccurate or fail to include necessary context; Reuters does not guarantee the accuracy of automated translated text and provides it solely for readers’ convenience. Reuters accepts no responsibility for any damage or loss resulting from the use of automated translation functions.)

路透社•2026/10/09 16:16