Iran war impacts U.S. agricultural loans: soaring costs, rising loan demand, and banks tighten oversight

汇通财经2026/05/26 00:33

Show original

Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold. Trade now!

A welcome pack worth 6200 USDT for new users! Sign up now!

(1) The Middle East conflict has caused fuel and fertilizer costs to soar, creating new challenges for American farmers after Trump imposed additional tariffs last year to curb agricultural exports. To cope with rising costs, farmers continue to increase their demand for loans. According to a Chicago Federal Reserve survey, agricultural loan demand increased year-on-year for the 10th consecutive quarter in the first quarter, while the loan repayment rate index declined for the 10th consecutive quarter.(2) Farmers are cutting expenses: reducing planting, switching to crops that require less fertilizer, or using less fertilizer to control costs, but this increases the risk of lower yields. Banks have noted that clients are spending more cautiously, with reduced new land purchases and equipment sales. Some banks saw an increase in overdue agricultural loans in the first quarter, with loans over 90 days past due rising and additional provisions set aside for this (such as $1.2 million to $1.8 million).(3) The Trump tariffs have already dealt a heavy blow to agriculture, with nationwide farm bankruptcies surging by more than 40% year-on-year in 2025. Now, the cost increases brought about by the Iran war may make matters even worse. Although government loans and subsidies offer banks some protection, lenders are closely monitoring their clients. Experts point out that soaring diesel prices will push up costs at every stage from planting and harvesting to transportation, and small farmers are especially sensitive to rising costs.

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.

Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.

Trade now！

Latest Update October 9 – The Financial Times reported on Thursday that Starbucks (SBUX.O) has explored a potential acquisition of Chipotle (CMG.N). This move would bring CEO Brian Niccol back to the Mexican burrito chain he once led. Starbucks declined to comment, saying the company remains "fully focused" on its business turnaround. Chipotle's stock fell about 4% to $31.32 on Friday, after surging 6.2% in the previous trading session. Limited strategic rationale BTIG expressed "high skepticism," stating that the deal does not make sense operationally, would cause significant dilution for Starbucks shareholders, and would disrupt management operations. "Over the years we've heard many stories about multi-brand acquisitions... but few have materialized, and even fewer have succeeded," BTIG noted. William Blair pointed out that Starbucks’ $9.4 billion net debt as of June makes it difficult to finance an acquisition and could push the combined company’s leverage ratio to about six times—considered high for the restaurant industry. D.A. Davidson stated the probability of the deal succeeding is 20% or less, given the significant differences between the brands and the apparent lack of clear synergies. Raymond James noted that due to the low overlap in menus, supply chain benefits are likely limited, while performance among multi-brand restaurant platforms has been mixed. eMarketer’s Suzy Davidkhanian commented that Niccol's familiarity may reduce execution risk, but investors might still see the deal as a "costly distraction" during Starbucks’ transformation. (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters automatically translates its reports into several other languages. Automated translation may be inaccurate or fail to include necessary context; Reuters does not guarantee the accuracy of automated translated text and provides it solely for readers’ convenience. Reuters accepts no responsibility for any damage or loss resulting from the use of automated translation functions.)

路透社•2026/10/09 16:16