British Pound recovers against the Japanese Yen as Bailey strikes a hawkish tone
GBP/JPY trims part of its earlier intraday losses on Friday as the British Pound (GBP) draws support from hawkish remarks by Bank of England (BoE) Governor Andrew Bailey. At the time of writing, the cross trades around 214.15 after recovering from an intraday low of 213.59.
Speaking in Iceland, BoE Governor Andrew Bailey said that “softness in the economy and uncertainty around the Iran war shock means tolerating temporarily above-target inflation is an appropriate way to approach the policy trade-off.” He added that the central bank has already “tightened policy considerably” after taking expected rate cuts off the table in response to the shock relative to what had been expected by markets.
Bailey also noted that policymakers must “monitor the situation in the Middle East and how it affects the UK economy and inflation very closely” and “adjust policy as required.”
Earlier, the Japanese Yen (JPY) strengthened after Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama warned of decisive action on volatility, reviving intervention fears as USD/JPY neared 160. Reuters said Japan spent 11.7349 trillion Yen, or around 73.6 billion US Dollars, on intervention from April 28 to May 27.
Traders are also monitoring potential US-Iran peace progress after reports of a 60-day MOU. The agreement would extend the ceasefire and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
The latest developments pushed Oil prices lower, which could ease some pressure on the Yen given Japan’s heavy dependence on imported energy from the Middle East.
The deal is still not finalized, so the Yen remains vulnerable if Oil prices rebound due to renewed tensions or stalled negotiations.
Softer-than-expected inflation data released earlier on Friday clouds the Bank of Japan’s (BoJ) gradual tightening outlook. This raises the risk of a wider interest rate gap with the BoE and keeps the GBP/JPY bias tilted to the upside.
Japan’s Tokyo Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 1.4% YoY in May, down from 1.5% in April, while CPI excluding Food and Energy eased to 1.6% from 1.9%.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Firmus backed by Nvidia delays Australian listing, casting a shadow over data center IPO candidates
The Australian IPO of data center company Firmus Grid Ltd., supported by Nvidia (NVDA.US), is expected to be delayed, which is an ominous sign for other companies planning to go public.
Natural gas pipeline delays threaten the progress of AI data center projects! Oracle (ORCL.US) resorts to the "trucking gas" strategy to ensure power supply
Oracle (ORCL.US) is adopting a novel power supply strategy—transporting natural gas directly to server campuses by truck—to ensure that multiple data center projects progress as planned.
U.S. budget deficit soars to nearly $2 trillion, exceeding 6% of GDP; high interest rates and tax cuts further worsen the deficit
The US budget deficit for fiscal year 2026 has risen to $1.993 trillion, a year-on-year increase of 12%, marking the highest level since 2021 and projected to account for over 6% of GDP. High interest rates have pushed net interest payments to over $1.1 trillion, accounting for more than half of the deficit increase; lower-than-expected tax and tariff revenues have further worsened the financial shortfall. With just weeks left before the midterm elections, neither party intends to implement substantial fiscal consolidation, and the deficit outlook is highly dependent on the election results.
To deliver computing power, Oracle uses trucks to transport natural gas to power its data centers
To address pipeline delays in AI data center construction, Oracle has adopted an unconventional energy supply method by transporting compressed natural gas via trucks, which has already been implemented in Utah and Texas, and is also being considered for the "Project Jupiter" in New Mexico. However, this solution costs four times as much as pipeline natural gas and is limited in scale, covering only a small fraction of the project's total capacity.
