Copper: Tariff risks keep spreads elevated – ING
ING’s Commodities Strategist Ewa Manthey notes that LME copper is trading near record highs, supported by supply tightness, US tariff-driven stockpiling and AI-related power demand. The market is already pricing US tariff risk, with the COMEX-LME spread around $400/t. ING expects a tight global copper balance into 2026, with the tariff outcome shaping spreads and inventory visibility.
Tariff scenarios drive COMEX-LME copper spread
"The US tariff decision on copper imports is weeks away, with the Commerce Secretary due to deliver a recommendation to President Donald Trump by 30 June. The market has already begun pricing the outcome. The COMEX-LME spread has widened to around $400/t, suggesting the market continues to price meaningful tariff risk into US-delivered refined copper."
"LME copper is trading near record highs, with prices up around 10% year-to-date and holding up well against a difficult macro backdrop. Strong US jobs data has reinforced expectations that the Federal Reserve will keep policy restrictive for longer, while renewed tensions involving Iran have weighed on broader risk sentiment."
"A confirmed 15% phased tariff from 1 January 2027 would likely increase the premium of COMEX over LME copper. In practice, both benchmarks would move higher. COMEX would be supported by stronger US import demand, while LME would also benefit as metal diverted away from the US tightens supply availability elsewhere."
"We forecast the global copper market to move into a deficit of around 35kt in 2026, reflecting mine supply losses across Chile, the DRC and Zambia, alongside disruptions to Middle Eastern sulphur flows and sustained end-use demand in electrification and grid infrastructure. The tariff outcome does not change that underlying market balance. However, it will determine how quickly the deficit becomes visible in exchange inventory data and how the price gap between COMEX and LME evolves."
"We see LME copper broadly supported at current levels through 2Q, before easing modestly into 3Q and 4Q as the initial tariff stockpiling impulse fades and macro headwinds persist. The tariff announcement itself represents near-term upside risk to our near-term forecast. A front-loaded 30% tariff would put further upside in play. Conversely, a delay or outright rejection of tariffs represents the clearest downside risk to our view over the second half of the year."
(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Federal Reserve meeting minutes: All 19 policymakers support a rate hike in September, but reasons vary; most expect further hikes this year, suggesting no urgency in October.
Most officials view a September interest rate hike as an "insurance" measure against stubborn inflation; a minority see it as a necessary step to curb inflation. Overall, there is no indication of a desire to push for consecutive rate hikes. The "New Fed News Agency" emphasized the minutes: "Most participants believe that it may be appropriate to raise interest rates again before the end of the year." Nearly all officials believe inflation remains elevated and the labor market is close to full employment. Many noted that, despite the rise in long-term U.S. Treasury yields, financial conditions are still conducive to economic growth. Some officials believe that AI will boost investment and productivity, but may also contribute to inflation. The minutes revealed that the U.S.-Japan joint intervention in July to support the yen was a U.S. Treasury action, with no Federal Reserve funds used.
Solana Consolidates After Sharp Expansion
FLOKI Recovery Tests Key Resistance
100 Million Barrels Shrinkage? Reports Say EU Believes Oil Reserve Release Plan Mainly Fulfills Previous Commitments, Not New Quotas
Last Friday, G7 member countries agreed to release up to 100 million barrels of crude oil and diesel reserves. The IEA had announced a plan to release 400 million barrels in March, and as of last Friday, about 75 million barrels had yet to be released. Most EU member states believe that this action is simply fulfilling previous commitments rather than adding new releases. Regarding the earlier-than-scheduled release of diesel stocks emphasized in last week's G7 agreement, EU member states consider it feasible, but on a limited scale.
