Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
BHP takes $2.3B hit on Jansen as cost of potash mine swells again

BHP takes $2.3B hit on Jansen as cost of potash mine swells again

Mining.comMining.com2026/06/18 15:42
By:Mining.com

BHP Group (ASX: BHP) plans to book a $2.3 billion impairment on its giant Jansen potash mine in Saskatchewan, Canada, citing cost and timing overruns for its planned expansion.

var rnd = window.rnd || Math.floor(Math.random() * 10e6); var pid472436 = window.pid472436 || rnd; var plc472436 = window.plc472436 || 0; var abkw = window.abkw || ''; var absrc = 'https://servedbyadbutler.com/adserve/;ID=181210;size=0x0;setID=472436;type=js;sw=' + screen.width + ';sh=' + screen.height + ';spr=' + window.devicePixelRatio + ';kw=' + abkw + ';pid=' + pid472436+ ';place=' + (plc472436++) + ';rnd=' + rnd + ';click=CLICK_MACRO_PLACEHOLDER'; document.write('
');

In an announcement Thursday, the world’s biggest miner said it decided to take the write-down after a “comprehensive review” of the mine’s Stage 2 expansion, which is now expected to cost $6.9 billion — about $2 billion more than its previous estimate.

Jansen, currently in the construction phase, represents a key pillar in BHP’s decades-long strategy to diversify from copper and iron ore.

After years of debate surrounding the project’s huge price tag, the Melbourne-based group approved the Stage 1 mine build, with an original cost of $5.7 billion. Since then, the cost estimate has swelled, but first production has also been pushed forward to 2027.

Before that cost surge, BHP had already greenlit the Stage 2 expansion in October 2023, as rising fertilizer prices after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine provided a favourable market environment for the company to accelerate its potash plans.

First production of Stage 2 was initially set for 2029. However, due to the cost overruns for Stage 1, management has since decided to delay the project by two years.

Cost increase ‘exceeded expecations’

The majority of the cost increase for Jansen Stage 2, says BHP, is from “additional construction hours and quantities of materials.” Given the increased costs, the company is now targeting first production late in the 2031 fiscal year.

Analysts at Jeffries, in a note to Reuters, said the cost increase of nearly 30% “exceeded expectations” and called the update “unhelpful” due to a poor foreseeable outlook for potash.

“We reiterate our hold rating on BHP as we see better value elsewhere in mining for now,” they added.

This represents the third time that BHP has blown past its cost and time estimates for both stages of the project. The cost of Stage 1, according to the company, is now estimated to be $8.4 billion, almost 50% higher than what was approved in 2021. Combined with Stage 2, the mine’s expected cost would reach $15.3 billion.

10% of global output

In its update on Thursday, BHP said the construction of Stage 2 is approximately 16% complete. Once complete, it is expected to deliver approximately 4.36 million tonnes per annum of production, similar to that of the first stage, which the company said is on track for production in the middle of fiscal 2027.

At full capacity, the operation is expected to deliver approximately 10% of total global potash production, it added.

“Once Jansen Stage 2 ramps up, we continue to expect that the combined Jansen mine will be the lowest unit cost Canadian potash mine at $114-130/t, in line with unit cost estimates at sanction, reinforcing Jansen’s durable competitive advantage in the potash market,” BHP said in a statement.

After taking the $2.3 billion charge, the company has maintained its capital expenditure guidance at approximately $11 billion.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports

路透社•2026/10/06 13:11

Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?

Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.

智通财经•2026/10/06 13:07