Europe’s EV market hits record high but a new China threat awaits
Fully electric cars grabbed their biggest-ever slice of the European market in May, as government support, cheaper-running costs and steeper petrol prices pushed more buyers toward battery power.
Across 17 European markets, battery electric vehicle (BEV) registrations climbed 34.4% compared with a year earlier, hitting 212,387 cars. That gave fully electric models a 23.6% share of the market, according to figures from E-Mobility Europe, New Automotive and Fier Automotive.
The May jump came after similar gains earlier in the year, with registrations up 34.1% in April and 51.3% in March. The trend points to a steady move away from petrol and diesel.
“Consumers and governments alike are responding to Europe’s energy security challenge, with every new electric car sold cutting fuel costs and permanently reducing oil imports,” said Chris Heron, Secretary General of E-Mobility Europe.
Local carmakers still held seven of the 10 top-selling BEV models, even as Chinese brands pushed harder for sales as reported by Cryptopolitan previously. France led the big economies with a 29.5% electric share in May.
Germany reached 25%, and its BEV registrations rose 41% over the first five months of the year. Italy was the fastest grower, with registrations doubling so far this year on the back of fresh subsidies. The Nordic countries and the Benelux region stayed ahead of the pack, with electric cars taking 78.7% of the market in Denmark, 49.6% in Finland, 41.2% in Sweden, 41.3% in the Netherlands and 36.8% in Belgium.
Hedge Funds Target Carmakers as Trucks Stay Strong
While carmakers feel the heat, hedge funds have been placing bets that European auto stocks will fall further, truckmakers have so far held firm. The shift to electric in road freight has long been seen as slower than in passenger cars. But that may be changing fast.
Daimler Truck, the world’s biggest maker of heavy lorries by sales, is celebrating the 130th anniversary of the first motorized truck, sold by its founder in 1896. Now Chinese rivals are crashing the party with electric models that threaten the diesel trucks pioneered by Gottlieb Daimler.
The old thinking was simple. Heavy trucks would switch to electric slowly because of heavy batteries, weak charging networks and high upfront costs. Chinese makers are testing that idea. Global sales of electric heavy freight trucks, those weighing 15 tonnes or more, almost tripled last year to roughly 230,000, the International Energy Agency reported. Most of that came from China, where electric models made up 28% of heavy truck sales.
Last Friday, China’s transport ministry set a target for “new energy” trucks to make up 40% of heavy truck sales by 2030, and a fifth of those on the road. CATL chair Zeng Yuqun has gone further, predicting electric trucks will pass half the market by 2028.
Beijing has named the sector a national priority, partly to cut reliance on imported oil after the Strait of Hormuz crisis rattled energy markets. Plans include 30,000km of “zero-carbon” highway corridors and 3,000 charging and battery-swapping stations.
About half a dozen Chinese truckmakers plan to enter Europe this year, where electric models made up under 2% of heavy truck sales in 2024, around 5,000 units, per the International Council on Clean Transportation. EU rules will help: average truck emissions must drop at least 90% from 2019 levels by 2040.
European truckmakers won little
Their shares, though, have done well. Daimler is up 41% since its December 2021 spin-off, against a 36% fall for Mercedes-Benz (ETR: MBG) and a 52% slump for Volkswagen (ETR: VOW).
In the US, fewer than 4,000 electric heavy trucks have been sold so far, says Wood Mackenzie. That could shift with Tesla’s Semi and China’s Windrose, both expected to cost under $300,000, against more than $400,000 today. Fleet owners could recoup the gap in about three years.
Stephen Meersman of Zenobē, which just raised £980mn in debt, warned incumbents not to drag their feet. “Frankly, they’ve got to get on with it, or they’re going to have a real problem on their hands.”
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports
Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?
Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.
Crypto prices
More
