Andrew Tate losses over $95,000 in Bitcoin and Hyperliquid trades after 8 liquidations in 24 hours
Andrew Tate lost about $95,478 on a leveraged Bitcoin trade and was liquidated eight times on Hyperliquid within 24 hours, Arkham Intelligence reported.
The kickboxer closed a losing long position on June 17, then quickly returned with another large bet. His new trade was a 40x Bitcoin short worth roughly $934,000.
The loss drew attention to Andrew’s record on the decentralized derivatives platform. Lookonchain data places his total Hyperliquid liquidations at 107. Earlier reports put his combined losses there near $800,000. Bitcoin weakened around the Federal Reserve’s rate decision.
Andrew closes a $3.79 million Bitcoin long as prices fall
On-chain data from Arkham Intelligence shows that Andrew purchased exposure of 57.36 Bitcoins via a long position with leverage of 40x.
The face value of the contract stood at roughly $3.79 million. Andrew was anticipating an increase in the price of bitcoin, but unfortunately, prices dropped as investors were waiting for the Fed’s monetary policy decision.
As losses mounted, Andrew increased the margin by $72.11 for the trade. This additional margin allowed him to take on more risk for the trade, but it did not help him in averting the loss. He closed the position and incurred losses worth $95,478.
He did not stay out of the market. Soon after closing the long, Andrew opened a bearish contract covering 14.33 Bitcoin using 40x leverage. The position was valued near $934,000 at the time. The new bet would gain if Bitcoin continued falling.
The switch came during a difficult 24-hour period on Hyperliquid for leveraged crypto traders worldwide. Arkham said Andrew suffered eight separate liquidations during that window. Lookonchain’s wider tally shows more than one hundred liquidations across his trading history on the platform.
Andrew has spoken about crypto for years and has presented it to followers as a route to financial freedom. He has also been connected to meme coins such as Daddy Tate, Roost, Germany Token, and FTRISTAN. Several later crashed and faced criticism from crypto traders.
Romanian officials brought more attention to his crypto holdings in 2023. Authorities investigating claims involving human trafficking, money laundering, and sexual offenses took control of assets that reportedly included wallets tied to him. Andrew has denied the allegations.
Bitcoin and Ethereum fall after the Fed keeps rates unchanged
Bitcoin (BTC-USD) began Thursday, June 18, 2026, at $64,450.44. That opening price was 1.8% below Wednesday’s level. By press time, Bitcoin had dropped to $62,980.59.
Ethereum (ETH-USD) opened at $1,748.91, down 2.3% from the previous day’s opening. It traded at $1,744.25 by press time. Both coins remained well above their prices from one week earlier, but each lost ground after the Fed left interest rates unchanged.
The crypto decline continued even after the United States and Iran signed a peace agreement. Investors focused more heavily on stocks and on plans to reopen the Strait of Hormuz faster. The waterway is important for global energy shipments.
The war still left open the chance of higher rates. That concern stayed in the market even as oil prices fell and stock indexes reached new highs.
Trump addressed the Iran deal and the market on Truth Social, which is owned by Trump Media & Technology Group (NASDAQ: DJT). He wrote: “These fools, who think I haven’t been tough enough on Iran, when the Stock Market Just Hit A RECORD HIGH, and Oil prices are ‘tumbling’ down, are either jealous, bad people, or stupid.”
He also said oil was flowing, Iran could not obtain a nuclear weapon, jobs were at records, prices were falling, and the United States was “strong, safe, and respected like never before.”
Minutes later, Trump posted again: “There is no 300 Billion Dollar payment to Iran by the U.S. That’s Fake News! All there is for the U.S. is Success, Lower Oil Prices, and Victory. Check out the Stock Market. Dumocrat propaganda at play!!! President DJT”
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports
Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?
Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.
