Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Peter Schiff accuses Michael Saylor of misleading STRC buyers

Peter Schiff accuses Michael Saylor of misleading STRC buyers

Crypto.NewsCrypto.News2026/06/18 19:12
By:Crypto.News

Peter Schiff has accused Michael Saylor of misleading investors in Strategy’s STRC preferred stock, as the security has fallen roughly 15% below its $100 par value.

Summary
  • Peter Schiff claimed STRC investors may have legal grounds against Michael Saylor if risks were not properly disclosed.
  • STRC fell to a record low of $82.53, intensifying concerns over Strategy’s dividend obligations and funding model.
  • QCP warned Strategy’s liquidity may support dividends for only 7.5 months, while insider sales added to investor scrutiny.

In a series of X posts on June 18, the longtime Bitcoin critic argued that some retirees and income-focused investors who purchased STRC after Saylor promoted its yield could have grounds for legal action if they were not adequately informed about the risks associated with the investment.

If you are a retiree who bought $STRC last month and you have already lost 15% of your principal, don't worry. You likely have an ironclad lawsuit against $MSTR, so long as you purchased based on @Saylor's promotion that touted the yield without properly disclosing the high risk.

— Peter Schiff (@PeterSchiff) June 18, 2026

STRC fell to a record low of $82.53 on Thursday before rebounding to $86.97 at press time, extending its decline well below the stock’s $100 par value. The drop has intensified debate around Strategy’s capital structure and its ability to support dividend obligations tied to its growing lineup of preferred securities.

Peter Schiff accuses Michael Saylor of misleading STRC buyers  image 0 Source:

Schiff claimed investors who bought STRC based on yield-focused marketing may have an “ironclad” case against Strategy and its co-founder if risk disclosures were insufficient. He further alleged that Saylor may have violated securities marketing rules, although he did not provide evidence that regulators had opened any investigation or taken enforcement action.

According to Schiff, the stock’s decline creates a problem for future fundraising because new investors may demand higher yields before buying additional STRC shares. He argued that if Strategy wants to return the preferred stock to its $100 par value while continuing to issue new shares, dividend costs could increase significantly.

Dividend concerns have moved into focus

Attention on Strategy’s funding model has increased after market maker QCP estimated that the company’s current liquidity could support dividend payments for about seven and a half months.

According to QCP, Strategy recently repurchased nearly $1.5 billion of convertible notes due in 2029 while raising approximately $200 million through MSTR share sales. The firm also used part of those proceeds to acquire another $100 million worth of Bitcoin, continuing its long-running accumulation strategy.

Based on its analysis, QCP suggested that Strategy could eventually face pressure to find additional sources of capital if current funding channels become less attractive. The market maker noted that future Bitcoin sales could become one option should liquidity conditions tighten.

Those concerns have emerged alongside weakness in both Strategy’s common and preferred securities. MSTR was trading near $109 on Thursday, down nearly 6% on the day and over 7% during the past five sessions.

Peter Schiff accuses Michael Saylor of misleading STRC buyers  image 1 Source:

Critics question whether Bitcoin purchases still benefit shareholders

Recent criticism from Schiff has extended beyond STRC to Strategy’s broader Bitcoin acquisition strategy.

Earlier this week, he argued that the company’s approach worked more effectively when MSTR traded at a large premium to the value of its Bitcoin holdings. According to Schiff, issuing stock above net asset value previously helped increase Bitcoin exposure on a per-share basis.

Following Strategy’s purchase of 1,550 BTC for roughly $101 million in early June, Schiff claimed the transaction reduced shareholder value because the company issued more equity than the Bitcoin it added on a per-share basis. He described the outcome as a “negative Bitcoin yield.”

Meanwhile, insider transactions have added another layer to the discussion. A recent filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission showed Strategy director Jarrod Patten exercised options to acquire 1,500 Class A shares before selling them on the open market. SEC filings indicate Patten has sold 55,750 MSTR shares over the last three months, generating proceeds approaching $9 million.

As STRC continues to trade well below par value, Schiff maintains that investors face increasing risks. Strategy and Saylor have not publicly responded to his latest allegations as of press time.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports

路透社•2026/10/06 13:11

Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?

Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.

智通财经•2026/10/06 13:07