New Texas power grid allocation framework could lift bitcoin miners turned data center operators
Shares of several bitcoin miners with large Texas campuses that are expanding into AI and data center infrastructure gained on Thursday as state regulators approved a new framework for connecting large electricity users to the grid.
Cipher Digital (CIFR) reached a new all-time high of $30 today and is up over 10% according to The Block's, while Core Scientific (CORZ) and Riot Platforms (RIOT) were up 3% and 2.2%, respectively.
This comes as the Public Utility Commission of Texas approved ERCOT's new "Batch Zero" process for allocating grid capacity power to large-scale electricity users.
Texas is grappling with a massive wave of power demand from the AI data center sector. ERCOT says more than 438,000 megawatts of are currently in its connection queue, with roughly 90% of those requests coming from data centers.
The Electric Reliability Council of Texas developed the new system after realizing its older approach of evaluating power requests one by one was becoming too slow.
As the title suggests, projects will now be evaluated in batches, allowing the agency to "assess how all the projects interact with each other and with the existing grid, producing a single, coordinated picture of what transmission upgrades are needed."
The changes could be a boon for the handful of bitcoin mining firms that have spent years building power-hungry facilities across Texas and are now marketing their campuses for AI and high-performance computing workloads.
Cipher Digital has signed multiple hyperscaler AI agreements across its Texas facilities, including a $5.5 billion at its Black Pearl campus and an earlier Barber Lake deal supported by a Google guarantee.
Riot Platforms reported its data center revenue debut earlier this year, generating $33 million while expanding AMD's lease agreement to 50 megawatts. It continues to build out its Corsicana campus, which is expected to support up to 1 gigawatt in power.
Meanwhile, Core Scientific generated $78 million in colocation revenue in the first quarter, more than double the revenue from its bitcoin mining operations.
A national issue
Texas is not alone in struggling to meet power demands for AI infrastructure.
Also on Thursday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) ordered six regional grid operators outside of Texas to show that the companies building data centers in their regions aren't passing those costs onto households and businesses and that their policies protect grid reliability.
FERC Chair Laura Swett described the issue as one of the country's top priorities.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports
Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?
Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.
