Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Is SpaceX the Ultimate Exit Liquidity for Billionaires?

Is SpaceX the Ultimate Exit Liquidity for Billionaires?

BeInCryptoBeInCrypto2026/06/18 21:09
By:BeInCrypto
The SpaceX exit liquidity narrative is everywhere since the IPO last week. Critics argue that the huge demand for SpaceX shares could let early investors, employees, or insiders sell stock at very high valuations while new buyers, especially retail investors, take the risk. However, the S-1 filing, the lock-up calendar, and crypto futures positioning suggest the opposite, at least for now. Who Can Sell SpaceX Shares Early? It is critical to start with the supply side of the exit liquidity question. The offering sells only newly issued SpaceX shares. The company raised about $75 billion from 555.6 million new Class A shares, and theS-1 confirms that no existing holder sells at listing. Every dollar goes to SpaceX itself, largely to fund its AI buildout. Many readers asking how to buy SpaceX IPO shares assume insiders sell to them directly. They do not. Insiders keep roughly 95.8% of the equity. Elon Musk and certain significant investors agreed to a 366-day lock-up, an agreement that blocks sales for a set period. Employees face restrictions too. Lower-tier staff, such as welders, became paper millionaires this week, but their equity stays frozen until the first release window after Q2 earnings. They cannot dump SpaceX stock today, no matter how much they want to. The one true carve-out is a directed share program covering up to 5% of the IPO sharesfor individuals selected by executives. Even they reportedly sell only after the first earnings report, and they buy fresh stock at the offer price. So if nobody connected to SpaceX can sell today, who wants to sell later, and when does the door open? The Billionaires Want Out, but the Lock-Up Sets the Date The sellers in waiting are real, and this is where the SpaceX IPO exit liquidity story finds its grain of truth. Google or Alphabet holds about 5% of the company after the xAI merger diluted its earlier 6.11% stake. That position could be worth up to $100 billion, a roughly 100x gain on its 2015 investment. They might want to liquidate some of that. Early venture backers sound the same alarm. Space Capital founder Chad Anderson told Fortune: Weve been invested for almost ten years, its our business to return capital to investors. Yet, their exit runs through the SpaceX lock-up schedule. Up to 20% of eligible insider shares unlock after Q2 earnings, expected between mid July and September. Another 10% unlocks if SPCX holds 30% above the offer price for five of ten sessions. Five 7% tranches follow at 70, 90, 105, 120, and 135 days, with 28% more after Q3 earnings and full release at 180 days. That metered supply meets a scheduled buyer. Nasdaqs fast entry rule and MSCIs early inclusion push index funds, and the retirement accounts behind them, to buy SpaceX stock within weeks of listing. Passive inflows become standing demand for whatever insiders release. The financials explain why some may hurry. SpaceX reported $18.7 billion in 2025 revenue with a $4.9 billion net loss, as Starlinks $4.4 billion operating profit funded a $6.4 billion xAI loss. The SpaceX valuation sits near 94 times trailing sales, and Facebooks staggered 2012 lock-up still ended 40% below its offer price. Selling pressure is therefore scheduled, not imaginary. SpaceX is valuing its company at $1.7 trillion based on the IPO offer price.If you consider revenue at $18bn, that means SpaceX is about 94 times sales.Context? Tesla is 15 times the sales.More context? NVIDIA is 21 times the sales.Use this information as you will. Whether retail stands beneath it depends on who actually received the allocation. Retail Was Cut Back, Not Loaded Up If insiders planned to unload on small investors, the allocation should have maximized the retail bag. The opposite happened. Retail investors submitted more than $100 billion in orders to buy SpaceX IPO shares, exceeding the $75 billion deal size, and total demand reached 3.5 to 4 times the available stock. SpaceX then cut the retail allocation to the low 20% range from a planned 30% because institutional appetite was strong. BlackRock alone ordered at least $5 billion, while sovereign funds took allocations of more than $1 billion each. Mechanics weaken the bag-holder framing further. Fills were random or pro rata, depending on the broker, and brokers debit cash only for shares actually received. Anyone who failed to buy SpaceX shares in the offering simply keeps their money. The exit liquidity story only works if retail ends up as the bag holder. That requires one of two traps. Either retail holds shares it cannot sell, or it got handed shares nobody else wanted. SPCX retail escaped both, since it can sell from day one and received fewer shares than it ordered. Read the article at BeInCrypto
0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports

路透社•2026/10/06 13:11

Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?

Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.

智通财经•2026/10/06 13:07