Arca’s Jeff Dorman sees only one fix for Strategy’s STRC crisis
Strategy’s STRC preferred stock has fallen as much as 17% below its $100 par value, prompting Arca Chief Investment Officer Jeff Dorman to argue that selling billions of dollars worth of Bitcoin may be the company’s best path to easing pressure on its capital structure.
- Jeff Dorman says selling $3–4 billion in Bitcoin could help stabilize Strategy’s struggling STRC preferred stock.
- Dorman assigns a 70% chance that Strategy continues selling MSTR shares rather than reducing Bitcoin holdings.
- QCP and Peter Schiff have separately raised concerns about dividend funding, fundraising costs, and investor risks.
According to a June 18 X post by Dorman, the recent decline in STRC has left Strategy facing increasingly difficult choices as investors question the sustainability of its preferred stock obligations. The preferred security dropped to a record low of $82.53 on June 18 before recovering and closing at $88.59, remaining well below par value.
Describing the situation as the latest stage of the “MSTR pickle,” Dorman said management must decide whether to take direct action to restore confidence in STRC or continue operating under a structure that leaves multiple parts of the company exposed to uncertainty.
Selling Bitcoin could buy Strategy more time
In Dorman’s view, the most effective solution would involve Strategy selling between $3 billion and $4 billion worth of Bitcoin. Assigning a 25% probability to that outcome, he said such a move would provide additional flexibility, support STRC holders, and address concerns surrounding the preferred stock without materially changing the company’s long-term Bitcoin strategy.
While Dorman acknowledged that a large Bitcoin sale could weigh on the asset in the short term, he argued that it would buy the company significant time and reduce pressure on its financing structure.
His most likely scenario, however, points elsewhere. Dorman assigned a 70% probability to Strategy continuing its current approach of selling small amounts of MSTR stock at what he described as non-accretive levels.
Under that outcome, he said STRC investors would retain some hope of recovery while Bitcoin holdings remain largely intact, though common shareholders could face further downside.
The comments arrive as scrutiny surrounding Strategy’s financing model continues to intensify. As reported by crypto.news, Peter Schiff recently accused Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor of misleading investors who purchased STRC after it was promoted as a yield-generating investment.
Schiff argued that retirees and income-focused investors could have grounds for legal action if risks associated with the security were not adequately disclosed. He also warned that the stock’s decline could make future fundraising more expensive if investors begin demanding higher yields to purchase additional STRC shares.
Dividend obligations remain at the center of concerns
Beyond stock sales and Bitcoin disposals, Dorman assigned a 5% probability to what he called a “nuclear option” involving the elimination of payments tied to preferred securities.
According to Dorman, such a move could leave preferred shareholders recovering only 30 to 40 cents on the dollar while effectively shutting Strategy out of capital markets. At the same time, he said the company would eliminate an annual cash obligation of roughly $1.7 billion.
Separate concerns about liquidity have also emerged in recent weeks. Earlier, market maker QCP estimated that Strategy’s available liquidity could support preferred dividend payments for approximately seven and a half months.
QCP added that if existing funding channels become less attractive, the company may eventually need alternative sources of capital, with Bitcoin sales potentially becoming one available option.
Alongside those concerns, Dorman challenged Strategy’s valuation. Based on his calculations, the company holds roughly $35.2 billion in unencumbered Bitcoin collateral against an equity market capitalization of about $40.4 billion, leaving MSTR trading at approximately 1.15 times net asset value.
Given those figures, Dorman argued that MSTR should trade below net asset value and warned that the stock could continue falling unless Bitcoin stages a strong recovery. Even then, he said any upside would depend on Strategy avoiding additional dilution through dividends, asset sales, or future fundraising activities.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports
Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?
Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.
TAO crypto price consolidates – Why $318 is Bittensor’s next big test
Crypto prices
More
