Trace Finance Raises $32M Series A Led By CoinFund
Trace Finance announced a $32 million Series A led by CoinFund, positioning the raise around regulated banking and stablecoin settlement infrastructure across Brazil, the US and emerging markets.
TL;DR
- Trace Finance raised $32 million in a Series A led by CoinFund.
- The company is building regulated infrastructure that connects local bank rails with stablecoin settlement.
- Investors include Coinbase Ventures, Haun Ventures, Jump Crypto, Paxos and others.
- The company’s $10 billion processed-volume figure is self-reported and should be treated carefully.
Stablecoin Infrastructure Gets Fresh Institutional Capital
Trace Finance has raised $32 million in a Series A round led by CoinFund, giving the cross-border payments firm new capital to expand regulated stablecoin settlement infrastructure across Brazil, the United States, APAC, and other emerging markets. The round also included Coinbase Ventures, Haun Ventures, Jump Crypto, Valor Capital, Paxos, HOF Capital, Chainlink Labs, SNZ Capital, and strategic angel investors.
The raise lands at a time when stablecoins are moving from crypto-native trading rails into payment, treasury, and settlement use cases. For businesses operating across markets like Brazil and the US, the appeal is simple: stablecoins can move value quickly, but enterprises still need local bank connectivity, compliance workflows, FX handling, and trusted fiat endpoints.
Why Trace Is Framing It As Banking Infrastructure
Trace is not pitching stablecoins as a standalone solution. The company’s message is that stablecoins need regulated local banking infrastructure around them to become useful for enterprises. That includes Pix connectivity in Brazil, local compliance operations, bank-grade controls, and settlement rails that can bridge fiat and digital dollars.
According to the company, its infrastructure has processed more than $10 billion in cross-border volume. That figure is self-reported, so it should be treated as a company metric rather than independently audited market data. Even so, the investor list suggests that major crypto and fintech backers see regulated stablecoin settlement as a category worth funding.
LatAm Remains A Key Stablecoin Market
Latin America has become one of the clearest real-world testing grounds for stablecoins. In markets with currency volatility, expensive cross-border transfers, and complicated banking rails, dollar-linked tokens can offer a faster settlement layer. Brazil is especially important because it combines large payment volume, Pix adoption, strict FX rules, and a growing fintech ecosystem.
Trace says the US-to-Brazil corridor was its proving ground and that it now plans to expand the model internationally. That expansion matters because stablecoin payment infrastructure is becoming more competitive. Exchanges, payment processors, banks, and fintech firms are all trying to decide who controls the bridge between onchain liquidity and local accounts.
The Bigger Stablecoin Picture
The $32 million round is another sign that the stablecoin sector is maturing beyond simple issuance. The next layer is distribution and utility: who can connect tokens to payroll, vendor payments, treasury management, card networks, local banking systems, and regulated FX operations?
That is where companies like Trace are trying to position themselves. The opportunity is large, but the hard part is operational. Stablecoin settlement only works for enterprises if compliance, local licensing, counterparty controls, and banking relationships are strong enough to survive real-world use. This round gives Trace more room to build that bridge.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
This report is based on information from Business Wire and Trace Finance.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports
Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?
Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.
