John Boozman reveals why CLARITY Act faces Senate resistance
The CLARITY Act has entered another round of Senate negotiations, with Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman saying that limited understanding of the bill among lawmakers remains one of the biggest obstacles to its progress.
- John Boozman says many senators still do not fully understand the CLARITY Act.
- David Nage estimates lawmakers and industry participants are 80%–85% aligned on the bill.
- Cynthia Lummis believes a Senate vote before the August recess is more likely than before July 4.
According to a report from Punchbowl News, senators met on Thursday, June 18, to discuss the next phase of work on the crypto market structure legislation. Much of the proposal falls under the jurisdiction of the Senate Agriculture Committee, placing the panel at the center of efforts to move the bill toward a floor vote.
Speaking after the meeting, Boozman said discussions were advancing but acknowledged that many lawmakers are still unfamiliar with the legislation. He stated that most members do not fully understand the bill, describing that knowledge gap as a challenge as negotiators attempt to build support across the Senate.
The comments arrive as congressional leaders face increasing pressure to resolve remaining issues before lawmakers leave Washington for the August recess. Several last-minute meetings have been scheduled as Senate offices continue working through outstanding provisions tied to digital asset regulation.
Senate support appears stronger than public debate suggests
While Boozman highlighted concerns about member awareness, separate discussions on Capitol Hill suggest that disagreements over the substance of the legislation may be narrower than they appear.
As previously reported by crypto.news, David Nage, managing director and portfolio manager at Arca, said conversations with Senate offices led him to conclude that lawmakers and industry participants are roughly 80% to 85% aligned on the core elements of the bill.
In Nage’s assessment, stablecoin yield provisions no longer rank among the most contentious issues, despite continued criticism from JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon. Instead, Nage said attention has increasingly turned toward ethics and conflict-of-interest rules governing government officials involved in crypto-related business activities.
Following discussions with congressional staff, Nage stated that lawmakers are largely debating how such restrictions should be implemented rather than whether they should exist. He described the remaining divide as a political and enforcement matter rather than a disagreement over digital asset market structure itself.
Under Nage’s base-case scenario, lawmakers would settle the ethics language and reconcile competing proposals in the coming weeks, allowing the legislation to reach the Senate floor after Congress returns from recess on July 13.
Senate timeline remains the key uncertainty
Despite growing optimism from some supporters, the expected timing of passage remains unsettled.
During a recent interview with FOX Business, Senator Bill Hagerty said he hopes Congress can complete work on the legislation before the July 4 recess. Hagerty argued that the measure would provide the regulatory certainty needed for the U.S. digital asset sector to expand domestically rather than abroad.
Earlier, White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt also expressed optimism that lawmakers could approve the bill by Independence Day.
Other lawmakers have pointed to a longer timeline. Senator Cynthia Lummis has said a Senate floor vote before the August recess appears more likely than passage before July 4. Lummis has also noted that the legislation includes $150 million in funding intended to combat illicit cryptocurrency activity.
Supporters of the proposal contend that the bill would define the responsibilities of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission while establishing compliance standards for digital asset firms.
Lummis has further warned that if Congress fails to advance market structure legislation during the current legislative window, meaningful action on the issue could be postponed until 2030.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports
Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?
Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.
TAO crypto price consolidates – Why $318 is Bittensor’s next big test
Tokenization Becomes a Key Focus for the U.K. Financial Sector
Crypto prices
More
