24X Files SEC Proposal To Bring Tokenized Russell 1000 Stocks To Regulated Markets
TL;DR
- 24X National Exchange has filed a proposed SEC rule change tied to tokenized securities trading.
- The proposal would allow eligible securities, including Russell 1000 stocks and certain ETFs, to trade in tokenized form through a DTC pilot program.
- The filing is still a proposal, not an approval or live product, but it shows how traditional equity markets are moving closer to blockchain settlement rails.
24X National Exchange has put another tokenization proposal in front of US regulators, adding to the growing push to bring traditional securities onto blockchain-linked market infrastructure.
The exchange’s proposed rule change, listed as SR-24X-2026-20 in a Federal Register notice, would allow certain securities to trade in tokenized form as part of a Depository Trust Company pilot program. The proposal covers eligible securities such as Russell 1000 stocks and major exchange-traded funds, while preserving the existing market structure around order handling and trading priority.
The important point is that this is not a new crypto token market in the loose sense of the phrase. It is a proposed change to regulated securities trading rules. The filing describes how eligible members could indicate a preference for tokenized settlement while the securities continue to trade on the same book as their traditional counterparts.
How The 24X Tokenized Securities Proposal Works
Under the proposal, tokenized securities would not be treated as a separate class with a different execution priority. Instead, tokenized and traditional versions would trade alongside one another, provided they are fungible. That is an important design choice because it attempts to avoid splitting liquidity between two markets.
Participants that want tokenized settlement would use a digital flag when entering orders and provide wallet information where required. The actual clearing and settlement process would still be tied to DTC’s pilot framework, which is designed to test blockchain-based handling of eligible securities without abandoning the regulated clearing infrastructure that already supports US equity markets.
For crypto markets, this is the kind of development that matters because it moves tokenization out of theory and into the plumbing of traditional finance. The promise is not simply that stocks can be represented on-chain. The more meaningful question is whether regulated market participants can use blockchain rails while maintaining the investor protections, auditability, and settlement discipline expected in public securities markets.
Why It Matters For RWA And Crypto Regulation
Real-world asset tokenization has become one of the more durable crypto narratives because it connects blockchain infrastructure to markets that already have deep liquidity. Tokenized Treasuries, funds, and private credit products have gained traction, but public equities remain a much larger and more sensitive test case.
If proposals like 24X’s advance, they could help define how tokenized versions of mainstream securities are handled in the US. That would be especially important for institutions that want the operational benefits of tokenization without moving into loosely regulated offshore venues.
The filing also comes at a time when regulators are being pushed to clarify the boundary between crypto assets, securities, derivatives, and tokenized representations of existing financial products. A tokenized Russell 1000 stock is not the same thing as an altcoin. It is a representation of an existing security within a regulated framework, and that distinction is central to the proposal.
Still A Proposal, Not A Green Light
The caution here is simple: this filing should not be read as approval. It is a proposed rule change undergoing regulatory review. Until the SEC process is complete, there is no final green light for the market structure described in the filing.
Even so, the direction of travel is clear. Traditional exchanges and infrastructure providers are now actively exploring ways to bring tokenized settlement into regulated markets. That does not mean every proposal will be approved, but it does show that tokenization is becoming a market-structure issue rather than just a crypto-sector talking point.
For investors watching the RWA theme, 24X’s filing is another sign that the next phase of tokenization may be less about speculative tokens and more about making existing financial markets work differently behind the scenes.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports
Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?
Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.
