Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
AI Won’t Make You a Good Trader, But Here’s How the Pros Use It Anyway

AI Won’t Make You a Good Trader, But Here’s How the Pros Use It Anyway

BeInCryptoBeInCrypto2026/06/19 19:00
By:BeInCrypto
Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing how crypto and traditional markets get traded, yet four leading analysts agree it rewards skill rather than replacing it. The edge in AI in crypto trading still comes from clean data and human judgment. Charles Edwards of Capriole Investments and Julio Moreno of CryptoQuant call AI an accelerant for serious research. Benjamin Cowen and Michael van de Poppe, speaking on a separate panel, reach the same conclusion from the trading desk. Four Analysts, One Conclusion On-chain analytics and AI tools have moved from niche to mainstream across crypto research. Two BeInCrypto panels gathered four analysts who use them every day. Edwards founded Capriole Investments, a quantitative Bitcoin (BTC) hedge fund. Moreno serves as Head of Research at CryptoQuant. Cowen and van de Poppe are widely followed, independent market analysts. Speaking at the Market IntelligenceCouncil, Edwards said AI shifts the opportunity toward those who do the work. I think AI as well is making that playing field more opportunistic for certain people. On a separate panel, van de Poppe set the limit plainly. Its not going to make you a great trader if you werent a good trader in the first place. Where AI Already Helps The clearest gains show up in routine research. AI now compresses tasks that once took hours. Edwards pointed to faster analysis as the main benefit. The tool sets to do that are much more powerful and it can be done more quickly today with AI. Van de Poppe showed how accessible this has become. He built a sample crypto portfolio using a chatbot and free data feeds. Tools like AI agents now pull live market data on demand. You can build a portfolio and a dashboard of cryptocurrencies within five minutes with just free APIs. Van de Poppe demonstrates a crypto portfolio built by Claude, scored on technicals, fundamentals, and on-chain flow. Why AI Still Needs a Human Speed does not equal skill. Van de Poppe noted that his AI portfolio missed important context. It didnt create a basket of uncorrelated cryptos it doesnt have any macros in there. He said judgment fills that gap. Thats where the human knowledge and experience comes in and the intuition That the AI agent doesnt have or the LLM. He also warned against treating AI as magic. The tool will not deliver some sort of magic that creates an infinite money loop. That caution matches the wider market, where few experts back hands-off trading bots. Moreno said institutions trust data but keep testing it. They do trust it but they verify a lot, and are continuously monitoring if the data remains relevant. Inside the Models Professional funds treat AI as infrastructure, not a crystal ball. Edwards built his firm around large, tested models. We build hundreds of metrics and we also use hundreds of other data sources to build out comprehensive models Combining onchain technicals and macro data for many years to build out trading models. Caprioles Macro Index reflects that approach. The firm combines more than 60 on-chain, macro, and equities metrics into one machine-learning model. Most data platforms publish thousands of metrics, yet models still need careful curation. Caprioles Macro Index blends more than 60 metrics into a single machine-learning oscillator, shown here below Bitcoin price Cowen is building his own bot from the ground up. Right now all the bot does really is regurgitates things that I say. Its almost like an AI version of me. He avoids training on low-quality AI output to prevent model decay. I dont want it to use AI slop thats out there to create more AI slop Van de Poppe runs his fund the same way. AI writes the base of his trading algorithms, but a human keeps steering it, or it keeps working on stuff that is wrong for your system. The Data Behind the Models Every model depends on the data beneath it. Moreno gave the sharpest example of a data edge. They will trade for example mining stocks instead of waiting for your quarterly report youre tracking in real time actually what theyre mining. Network hashrate offers one such real-time signal. It tracks how much computing power miners commit to Bitcoin each day. Bitcoin network hashrate, a real-time gauge of mining activity, has climbed alongside price since 2022 The same method applies to equity exchanges. Bitcoin miner stocks have drawn fresh attention as AI infrastructure spending climbs. Julio Moreno continues: Some of the crypto exchanges have also started trading on stock exchange and so you can be monitoring the trading volume to assess the revenues. Cowen added that data quality decides the outcome. He values records from before the AI era. Data before 2022 in some ways is actually really valuable because it was data before all the AI stuff was even here. For institutions and retail traders alike, the lesson holds. AI compresses the work and widens access, but the advantage flows to operators with clean data and the judgment to steer the model. As adoption spreads, that judgment becomes the real differentiator.
0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports

路透社•2026/10/06 13:11

Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?

Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.

智通财经•2026/10/06 13:07