Igloo develops instrument for crypto tokens to list on NYSE as registered securities
Igloo Inc., the company behind the Pudgy Penguins NFT brand, has built a financial instrument designed to let crypto tokens trade as registered securities on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq. CEO Luca Netz disclosed the development on June 17 during an appearance on the Uneasy Money podcast.
The catch: actually getting a token listed this way requires traditional financial underwriting from firms like Goldman Sachs or Morgan Stanley. That process carries an estimated price tag of $10-20 million, a sum that would price out the vast majority of crypto projects before they even reach the starting line.
How the instrument works
The structure promises one-to-one trading parity with existing crypto markets. In English: if a token trades at $50 on a decentralized exchange, it should trade at $50 on the NYSE through this instrument, without the premium or discount that often plagues crypto-adjacent products in traditional finance.
It also includes onchain redemption capabilities, meaning holders could theoretically convert their exchange-listed position back into the underlying crypto token. And perhaps most notably, it enables direct revenue distributions from protocols to token holders, something that existing ETF wrappers simply cannot do.
Netz used a hypothetical example during the podcast, describing how a token similar to Aave’s DAO governance token could be a candidate for this kind of listing. No specific token has been named as the first to go through the process, and no launch timeline has been announced.
Netz characterized the instrument as a security, though regulatory bodies have not yet confirmed that classification. That distinction matters enormously. The entire value proposition hinges on whether the SEC and other regulators agree that this structure qualifies as a registered security eligible for listing on a national exchange.
The $10-20 million wall
The instrument itself might be elegant, but the economics of getting it to market are decidedly not. Traditional financial underwriting is the bottleneck, and the estimated $10-20 million cost reflects the reality of working within TradFi’s existing infrastructure.
That underwriting fee covers due diligence, regulatory filings, distribution networks, and the reputational risk that a Goldman or Morgan Stanley takes on when it puts its name behind a product. For a blue-chip DeFi protocol generating hundreds of millions in annual revenue, $10-20 million might be a reasonable cost of accessing a vastly larger investor pool. For a mid-tier project with a $200 million market cap, it’s a non-starter.
The cost structure also positions this instrument in direct competition with crypto ETFs, which have their own expenses but distribute those costs across a broader base of investors rather than requiring the issuing project to foot the bill upfront.
Why this matters now
Igloo’s announcement lands in a broader context of accelerating convergence between crypto and traditional markets. The NYSE itself launched a tokenized securities platform in January 2026, signaling that the world’s most prominent stock exchange sees blockchain-native assets as part of its future.
ETFs have been the default answer, but they come with limitations. An ETF wrapper strips away many of the features that make crypto tokens distinctive, particularly governance rights and direct revenue sharing from protocol activity. Investors in a hypothetical Aave ETF would get price exposure, but they wouldn’t receive the fee distributions that Aave token holders on-chain currently enjoy.
The other emerging model, digital asset treasury companies, has shown its own weaknesses. These structures, where a publicly traded company holds crypto on its balance sheet, frequently trade at significant premiums or discounts to the value of their underlying assets. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) has been the poster child for both the upside and the dysfunction of this approach.
What this means for investors
For institutional investors, the appeal is straightforward. Many pension funds, endowments, and registered investment advisors operate under mandates that restrict them to securities listed on recognized national exchanges. A crypto token listed on the NYSE as a registered security would pass through compliance filters that spot ETFs and certainly raw token purchases cannot.
But the risks are substantial. Regulatory classification remains unconfirmed, the underwriting costs create a high barrier to entry, and no actual listing has been completed or even scheduled.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports
Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?
Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.
TAO crypto price consolidates – Why $318 is Bittensor’s next big test
Tokenization Becomes a Key Focus for the U.K. Financial Sector

