Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Ripple Effect: Why Stellar (XLM) Is Flying and XRP Is Stuck Near $1.13

Ripple Effect: Why Stellar (XLM) Is Flying and XRP Is Stuck Near $1.13

UTodayUToday2026/06/22 13:15
By:UToday

The long-standing alliance between two giants of the crypto payments segment — XRP and Stellar (XLM) — has been disrupted, while their synchronized price dynamics, previously mentioned even by former Ripple CTO David Schwartz, are now a thing of the past. 

Since the end of May 2026, the assets' charts have moved in opposite directions: while Stellar is recording major price gains, XRP continues to decline. Below is a detailed breakdown of tokenization fundamentals and the technical picture on the charts.

The battle for RWA

The sharp trend reversal was triggered by an official announcement from the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) about plans to launch asset tokenization — including stocks, ETFs and U.S. Treasuries — on the Stellar blockchain in the first half of 2027. Fresh metrics by explain why Stellar has taken the lead in this sector, even though the XRP Ledger (XRPL) has more launched RWA projects: 302 versus 68 for Stellar.

The difference in asset behavior is explained by the volume and activity of real capital:

  • Distributed Asset Value: On Stellar, this figure reached $2.83 billion, up 21.62% over 30 days. By comparison, XRPL stands at $360.32 million, down 10.83%.
  • 30-day RWA transfer volume: On Stellar, this metric increased by 142.34% to $661.84 million, while XRPL recorded only $44.93 million.
  • RWA investor base: The number of RWA holders on Stellar rose by 44.75% to 17,803 addresses, while XRPL has only 122 addresses.

The market certainly noticed these figures, which is why XLM has gained about 49.44% since the end of May, while XRP has shown negative dynamics over the same period, falling by 15.78%.

Ripple Effect: Why Stellar (XLM) Is Flying and XRP Is Stuck Near $1.13 image 0 Total distributed asset value across key blockchains, Source: RWA.xyz

At the same time, XRPL maintains an advantage in total stablecoin volume, with $922.42 million versus Stellar's $296.24 million, as well as in total 30-day stablecoin transfer volume, with $5.11 billion versus Stellar's $4.27 billion.

What's happening on the charts?

The indicators on the daily timeframe reflect a deep technical gap between the two assets.

On the XLM chart, the price explosion at the end of May is clearly visible: the price expanded the Bollinger Bands, broke above the upper band and reached a peak near $0.29. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) fell to 57.64 after leaving overbought territory, which points to market stabilization.

Ripple Effect: Why Stellar (XLM) Is Flying and XRP Is Stuck Near $1.13 image 1 XRP and XL.M price chart with Bollinger Bands and RSI attached, Source: TradingView

The XRP chart shows the opposite picture. In early June, the coin broke below the middle Bollinger Band, confirming the dominance of sellers. At the time of writing, XRP is trading near $1.13, trapped in a narrow range between the middle line at $1.1739 and the lower Bollinger Band at $1.0526. 

Meanwhile, the RSI has fallen to 39.34, reflecting buyer weakness but also approaching oversold territory.

Can XRP repeat XLM's success?

The current narrowing of the Bollinger Bands on the XRP chart indicates that the asset is accumulating energy before a strong move out of the price range. There are two possible scenarios:

  • Bullish scenario: If the price holds above the psychological level of $1.10 and the lower band at $1.0526, it would create a base for a rebound. To repeat Stellar's success, buyers need to restore XRPL's status as an active RWA platform, break through the middle line at $1.1739 and consolidate above the upper band at $1.2953. This would open the way toward targets in the $1.45–$1.60 area.
  • Bearish scenario: If buyers fail to hold current positions and capital continues to flow into the Stellar ecosystem, XRP risks dropping from $1.13 to retest the lower Bollinger Band at $1.0526, with the possibility of further decline toward the strong psychological support level at $1.00.
0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Technoprobe Started at Overweight by JPMorgan

Technoprobe Started at Overweight by JPMorgan

Dow Jones•2026/10/06 05:39

Our Pinterest Stock Pick Hasn't Worked. We're Dropping It. -- Barrons.com

By Jacob Sonenshine Pinterest is down about 42% since Barron's recommended the stock in June 2025. During that time the S&P 500 has gained 29%. Time to move on. The problem isn't that Pinterest doesn't have long-term growth potential. It's that it has repeatedly failed to sustain a super high growth rate, creating uncertainty. Our thesis was that revenue growth would hold strong and the company's artificial intelligence usage would enable it to match the right products and advertisements with users. The hope was that Pinterest, with its hundreds of millions of users and more than $4 billion of annual sales, would grow within a global digital ad market worth hundreds of billions, as it would increasingly monetize its users. It has grown -- but not consistently at a high rate. Pinterest will continue to grow, but the market's concern doesn't appear likely to subside soon; revenue growth often decelerates by several percentage points, which causes large selloffs in the shares. The root of the problem is that whenever growth slows, the market is left to wonder if the platform is beginning to lose its relevance. Users now have a crowded field of options for finding personal and household trinkets to buy. Maybe the growth story isn't as beautiful as investors had hoped years ago, when the stock was at record highs of close to $90. Consider second quarter earnings, which management released Aug. 4, and caused the stock to drop. Yes, sales of $1.18 billion beat analyst's expectations and grew about 18% year over year, and yes, adjusted earnings per share of 43 cents beat estimates and grew 30%, as profit margins expanded. But the guidance signaled slowing growth yet again. Management guided for third quarter revenue of $1.2 billion at the midpoint of the range. That implies 14% year over year growth. Chief Financial Officer Julia Donnelly said on the earnings call that second quarter growth was strong partly due to the combination of brands increasing their ad spend around Amazon Prime Day and "World Cup-related spend th

Dow Jones•2026/10/06 03:34