Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
US Crypto Industry Groups Urge Congress to Pass Original Mining and Staking Tax Bill

US Crypto Industry Groups Urge Congress to Pass Original Mining and Staking Tax Bill

BitcoinworldBitcoinworld2026/06/24 02:27
By:Bitcoinworld

A coalition of leading U.S. cryptocurrency industry groups is pressing Congress to advance a bill on mining and staking taxation in its original form, arguing that current tax treatment imposes excessive burdens on digital asset participants. The proposed legislation seeks to clarify that rewards from mining and staking activities should be taxed at the point of sale, not when they are created.

Background of the Bill

The bill, which has been introduced in the House of Representatives, addresses a long-standing point of contention within the crypto sector. Under current Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidance, many taxpayers are required to report mining and staking rewards as income at the moment they are received, even if those assets have not been sold or converted into fiat currency. Industry advocates argue this creates administrative uncertainty and can lead to unfair tax liabilities, particularly when the market value of the rewards may decline before they are cashed out.

Industry Arguments for Original Form

The coalition, which includes major trade associations and advocacy groups, contends that taxing rewards only upon sale aligns with the economic reality of these activities. “It is more reasonable to tax assets when they are actually cashed out, not when they are generated through network participation,” the groups stated in a joint letter to lawmakers. They warn that any amendments to the bill could dilute its intended clarity and leave taxpayers exposed to continued confusion.

Implications for Taxpayers and the Industry

If passed in its original form, the legislation would provide a clear framework for individuals and businesses engaged in proof-of-work mining and proof-of-stake validation. This could reduce compliance costs and encourage broader participation in blockchain networks. The bill also represents a rare moment of bipartisan alignment on digital asset policy, with sponsors from both parties citing the need for regulatory clarity to foster innovation while ensuring fair taxation.

Broader Context

The push comes amid a broader regulatory landscape where U.S. policymakers are grappling with how to treat digital assets across securities, commodities, and tax law. The Treasury Department and IRS have issued scattered guidance on crypto taxation, but industry participants have consistently called for comprehensive legislation. Similar bills have been introduced in previous sessions but failed to advance, making the current effort a critical test of congressional willingness to address crypto-specific tax issues.

Conclusion

The outcome of this legislative push will be closely watched by the crypto industry and tax professionals alike. If the bill moves forward in its original form, it could set a precedent for how digital asset rewards are treated under U.S. tax law, potentially reducing friction for millions of taxpayers and strengthening the country’s position as a hub for blockchain innovation.

FAQs

Q1: What does the proposed mining and staking tax bill aim to change?
The bill would tax rewards from crypto mining and staking only when they are sold or converted to fiat, rather than when they are created. This differs from current IRS guidance, which often treats rewards as taxable income upon receipt.

Q2: Why are industry groups urging Congress to pass the bill in its original form?
The groups argue that the original language provides the clearest framework for taxpayers and that amendments could introduce ambiguity or weaken the intended relief. They believe taxing at the point of sale is more practical and fair.

Q3: How would this bill affect individual crypto miners and stakers?
If enacted, individuals would no longer need to report the fair market value of rewards as income at the moment they are received. Instead, they would only report gains or losses when they sell the assets, simplifying tax filing and reducing the risk of overpayment.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Our Pinterest Stock Pick Hasn't Worked. We're Dropping It. -- Barrons.com

By Jacob Sonenshine Pinterest is down about 42% since Barron's recommended the stock in June 2025. During that time the S&P 500 has gained 29%. Time to move on. The problem isn't that Pinterest doesn't have long-term growth potential. It's that it has repeatedly failed to sustain a super high growth rate, creating uncertainty. Our thesis was that revenue growth would hold strong and the company's artificial intelligence usage would enable it to match the right products and advertisements with users. The hope was that Pinterest, with its hundreds of millions of users and more than $4 billion of annual sales, would grow within a global digital ad market worth hundreds of billions, as it would increasingly monetize its users. It has grown -- but not consistently at a high rate. Pinterest will continue to grow, but the market's concern doesn't appear likely to subside soon; revenue growth often decelerates by several percentage points, which causes large selloffs in the shares. The root of the problem is that whenever growth slows, the market is left to wonder if the platform is beginning to lose its relevance. Users now have a crowded field of options for finding personal and household trinkets to buy. Maybe the growth story isn't as beautiful as investors had hoped years ago, when the stock was at record highs of close to $90. Consider second quarter earnings, which management released Aug. 4, and caused the stock to drop. Yes, sales of $1.18 billion beat analyst's expectations and grew about 18% year over year, and yes, adjusted earnings per share of 43 cents beat estimates and grew 30%, as profit margins expanded. But the guidance signaled slowing growth yet again. Management guided for third quarter revenue of $1.2 billion at the midpoint of the range. That implies 14% year over year growth. Chief Financial Officer Julia Donnelly said on the earnings call that second quarter growth was strong partly due to the combination of brands increasing their ad spend around Amazon Prime Day and "World Cup-related spend th

Dow Jones•2026/10/06 03:34