Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnAISquareMore
Community rejects TAC Protocol’s ‘cascade of liquidations’ defense for price dump

Community rejects TAC Protocol’s ‘cascade of liquidations’ defense for price dump

CryptopolitanCryptopolitan2026/07/09 12:51
By:Cryptopolitan

TAC Protocol’s attempt to explain away a trading session where its TAC token lost around 90% of its value has stirred skepticism from holders after the project’s July 8 statement on X ruled out any exploit and also denied any foul play in the form of insider selling too, pinning the collapse on forced selling in the futures market. 

However, onchain researchers have presented a conflicting theory, saying the chain of transactions tells a different story as fingers point to a coordinated exit by 18 wallets.

What is the TAC team’s explanation of the events?

“The protocol operates exactly as designed,” the TAC account wrote, adding that the network “was not hacked in any form” and that onchain assets stayed secure.

The team stated, “The decline was a liquidation cascade triggered initially by a large perpetual futures sell order exceeding the relatively thin liquidity on the market.”

The team also stated that neither its own holdings nor those of early investors moved because both remain under vesting locks.

To restore confidence, TAC stated that they are focused on strengthening their market structure and deepening liquidity, though it disclosed no specifics.

Were insiders selling TAC?

Although they stopped short of pointing the finger at people with connections to TAC Protocol, a July 8 post by onchain analyst EmberCN counted 18 wallets offloading about 372 million TAC and walking away with 1.78 million USD1.

The tokens were moved off TAC’s native chain onto BNB Chain first, where they were sold. By EmberCN’s measure, the price fell 91%, from about $0.05 to $0.0045.

EmberCN stated, “This coin bears a striking resemblance in onchain dumping tactics to $SIREN from a month ago and $AKE from yesterday—it’s highly likely they’re all being manipulated by the same ‘conspiracy syndicate.’”

What are TAC Protocol’s numbers now?

The protocol’s native token, TAC, was trading around $0.065 at the end of June but now trades around $0.0026, a decline of around 96%.

It has a market cap over $12.2 million, and DefiLlama put its total value locked on the TAC chain at around $1.27 million.

This is not TAC’s first violent week, as the token had already dropped about 82% in a day, roughly two months after a $2.8 million bridge exploit on May 11 that the team reclassified as a white-hat incident once the attacker returned about 90% of the funds.

TAC reopened cross-chain transfers between TON and its own network on June 10.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Will the Fed "continue raising interest rates"? Will the "tightening cycle" of the late 1980s be repeated?

The Citi report points out that the current macro environment is highly similar to the tightening cycle of 1988-1989, when the economy remained resilient and inflation pressures gradually accumulated, followed by a slowdown in economic activity before policies shifted to easing. During that tightening cycle, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates 16 times in a row.

华尔街见闻2026/09/13 03:11

Rare alliance of arch-rivals! Musk and Altman support Dario Amodei's call to "slow down AI globally"

Anthropic's Amodei issued a call to "slow down AI globally," and to everyone's surprise, rivals Musk and Altman both publicly endorsed the initiative. The three industry giants unanimously agreed to grant third-party access to "employee-level" evaluation rights and to implement coordinated deceleration measures. Altman went further, announcing that OpenAI will not IPO this year. The resignation of a researcher and a collective breakout of uncontrollable AI systems have ignited long-standing industry fears.

华尔街见闻2026/09/13 02:16