Key Highlights
  • Hyperliquid wallet's ETH long fully liquidated — $1.08M loss confirmed
  • Same wallet holds 1,355.6 BTC ($110.85M) long on Hyperliquid with liquidation price at $80,035.70
  • Stop-loss set at $80,500 — just $464 above forced liquidation, creating a razor-thin buffer
  • Original combined position totalled $186.7M across BTC and ETH at maximum leverage

BREAKING

A single wallet on Hyperliquid had its Ethereum long position forcibly liquidated, booking a $1.08 million loss — while the same address continues to hold a $110.85 million Bitcoin long that sits less than 4% above its stop-loss trigger.

The wallet had previously built a combined position book of $186.7 million across both assets — 1,822 BTC ($149.5M) and 15,270 ETH ($37.25M) — all at maximum leverage on Hyperliquid’s perpetuals market.

The ETH Leg Is Gone — BTC Leg Is Next in Focus

The ETH position carried a liquidation price of $2,406.08. That level was breached, triggering full liquidation and crystallising the $1.08M loss. The ETH side of the trade no longer exists.

What remains is the Bitcoin position: 1,355.6 BTC worth $110.85 million at the time of reporting, with a liquidation price set at $80,035.70. The wallet has placed a stop-loss at $80,500 — meaning the position would be manually closed before forced liquidation triggers, assuming the stop executes as intended on Hyperliquid’s infrastructure.

Position Size Notional Value Liquidation Price Stop-Loss
ETH Long 15,270 ETH $37.25M $2,406.08 —
BTC Long (active) 1,355.6 BTC $110.85M $80,035.70 $80,500

Why This Position Size Matters for Market Structure

A single $110.85 million leveraged BTC long on a perpetuals venue is not a retail trade. Positions of this scale create visible liquidation clusters that market makers and algorithmic traders actively track. The $80,035–$80,500 band is now a publicly known liquidation and stop zone — which itself becomes a target in low-liquidity conditions.

This dynamic is directly relevant to the broader altcoin market structure. As covered in our analysis of TOTAL2’s falling wedge breakout and mid-November C-wave risk, leveraged long positioning at inflated notional sizes tends to amplify downside when stops cluster near the same level. A sweep of $80,500 on Bitcoin would cascade into altcoin deleveraging simultaneously.

It is also worth contextualising against the broader whale cohort. Our earlier report on new Bitcoin whales holding one-third of whale realized cap at a $77K cost basis established that significant on-chain demand exists below current prices — but that structural support sits well below the $80,500 stop level this wallet is defending.

Is the Remaining Position Sustainable?

The critical variable is Bitcoin’s spot price relative to $80,500. If BTC holds above that level, the position survives. If BTC trades through it, the stop-loss closes 1,355.6 BTC worth of long exposure in a single execution — a market order of that size on a perpetuals venue will move price, not absorb it quietly. The liquidation backstop at $80,035.70 sits just $464 below the stop, compressing the safety margin to near zero.

The metric to track is real-time BTC spot price against the $80,035–$80,500 cluster. The address tracker will reflect any position change the moment it occurs.

The ETH liquidation has already confirmed that this wallet’s risk management failed once. The BTC leg — $110.85 million still open — is the last remaining exposure. Watch $80,500 as the trigger level: a close below it either forces a manual stop-out or risks a cascade liquidation at $80,035.70.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the Hyperliquid gambler’s ETH liquidation price?

The ETH long position was liquidated at $2,406.08. The position size was 15,270 ETH ($37.25M notional), and the liquidation resulted in a confirmed $1.08M loss.

What happens if Bitcoin drops to $80,500?

The wallet has a manual stop-loss set at $80,500 on its 1,355.6 BTC ($110.85M) long. A close below that level triggers a stop-out before the forced liquidation price of $80,035.70 is reached — but a market order of that size on Hyperliquid will create significant price impact.

How large was the wallet’s total position before the ETH liquidation?

The wallet originally held $186.7M in combined leveraged longs: 1,822 BTC ($149.5M) and 15,270 ETH ($37.25M), both at maximum leverage on Hyperliquid’s perpetuals market.

Where can I track whether the BTC position is still open?

The position is live-trackable through the address tracker under the perps tab. Any stop-loss execution or liquidation will appear there in real time.
.social-share-section { margin: 24px 0; padding: 16px 20px; background: #f8f9fa; border-radius: 8px; border-left: 4px solid #7c3aed; } .share-title { font-family: 'Syne', sans-serif; font-weight: 700; font-size: 14px; color: #0e1120; margin-bottom: 12px; } .share-buttons { display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; gap: 8px; } .share-btn { display: flex; align-items: center; gap: 4px; padding: 5px 12px; background: #ffffff; border: 1px solid #e4e6f0; border-radius: 6px; color: #4a5068; text-decoration: none; font-family: 'Syne', sans-serif; font-weight: 600; font-size: 12px; transition: all 0.3s ease; cursor: pointer; height: 34px; } .share-btn:hover { transform: translateY(-2px); border-color: #7c3aed; color: #7c3aed; box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(124, 58, 237, 0.15); } .share-btn svg { width: 18px; height: 18px; } /* Mobile responsive */ @media (max-width: 768px) { .social-share-section { padding: 12px 16px; margin: 16px 0; } .share-buttons { gap: 6px; } .share-btn { padding: 5px 8px; font-size: 10px; height: 32px; } .share-btn span { display: none; } .share-btn { justify-content: center; padding: 8px; } }
function copyToClipboard(text) { navigator.clipboard.writeText(text).then(function() { var btn = document.querySelector('.share-copy'); if (!btn) return; var originalText = btn.innerHTML; btn.innerHTML = ' Copied!'; btn.style.color = '#16a34a'; setTimeout(function() { btn.innerHTML = originalText; btn.style.color = ''; }, 2000); }).catch(function(err) { ('Failed to copy: ' + err); }); }
🛡️  Trust & Editorial Standards — CoinsProbe ›
2. Sponsored Content & Advertising Policy

CoinsProbe may publish sponsored articles, affiliate links, or promotional collaborations. All sponsored material is clearly labeled to maintain transparency with our audience. Our editorial decisions remain fully independent, and advertising partnerships do not influence reviews, rankings, or published opinions.

3. Why Trust CoinsProbe

Since 2023, CoinsProbe has delivered reliable insights on cryptocurrency, blockchain, and digital assets. Our content is created by experienced researchers and analysts who follow strict editorial standards focused on accuracy, transparency, and credibility. Every article is carefully reviewed and verified using trusted sources and current market data. We provide unbiased analysis and timely updates covering everything from emerging crypto projects to major industry developments.